Re: [PATCH -next 1/4] ima: Use DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper in ima_modsig

[Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi Gaosheng,

Thank you for the patches.

On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 15:58 +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting
> C99 flexible-array members instead. So, replace zero-length array
> declaration with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro in struct
> modsig.
> 
> This helper allows for a flexible-array member in a union.
> 
> Link: KSPP#21
> Link: KSPP#193
> Link: KSPP#197

The above shortened link is a bit confusing.  The #193 complete link is
mentioned in the cover letter.  In all cases being modified the "[]" 
notation is used.  Is this a boiler plate patch description or are all
three of these links really applicable to each of the patches?  

- Eliminate fake flexible arrays from the kernel ("variable length"
one-element and zero-length arrays) #21
- Replace fake flexible-array declarations with the
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro #193
- Address -Wzero-length-array warnings reported by Clang #197

> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html

Shouldn't this link be in the cover letter?  And the applicable
link(s), as shown in the cover letter, here in the patches?

-- 
thanks,

Mimi

> Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c
> index fb25723c65bc..d132383dbb64 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct modsig {
>  	 * storing the signature.
>  	 */
>  	int raw_pkcs7_len;
> -	u8 raw_pkcs7[];
> +	DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(u8, raw_pkcs7);
>  };
>  
>  /*