linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] security/ima: use fs method to read integrity data
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 17:09:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494623376.4997.28.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511081659.GA20214@lst.de>

On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 10:16 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:00:47PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Without i_version support the file is measured/appraised once. ?With
> > i_version support it will be re-measured/appraised. As a file system
> > is mounted/remounted, some sort of message should be emitted
> > indicating whether i_version is supported.
> 
> You can check for (sb->s_flags & MS_I_VERSION) to see if it's supported.

Yes, I defined a new LSM hook to catch the new mounts, but there are
lots of mounts, even after to limiting it to non-kernel mounts
(MS_KERNMOUNT) and only checking if the MS_I_VERSION is set on
filesystems mounted read-write. ?It would be nice if there was a way
of saying not pseudo filesystems (eg. CGROUP_SUPER_MAGIC,
DEBUGFS_MAGIC, DEVPTS_SUPER_MAGIC, PROC_SUPER_MAGIC, SECURITYFS_MAGIC,
SYSFS_MAGIC, etc).

> 
> > ?That does not imply that
> > there is no value in measuring/appraising the file only once.
> > 
> > With this patch, the "opt-in" behavior, is only for measurement, not
> > appraisal. ?For appraisal, it still enforces file hash/signature
> > verification, as it should, based on policy.
> > 
> > Christoph, could we call ->read_iter() in the NULL case as Boaz
> > suggested?
> 
> No - that way you get deadlocks for every fs that uses i_rwsem in
> ->read_iter, which is perfectly valid behavior.
> 
> We can set ->integrity_read for every file system that's been tested
> with IMA, though.  Do you have a list of known-good file systems?

In addition to the ones you've already defined, we need definitions in
ramfs/file-mmu.c and file-nommu.c, and the corresponding tmpfs, to get
the initial measurements from the initramfs.
?
We know that stacked filesystems have similar locking problems. ?I'm
loop back mounting each filesystem and testing to see if files are
being measured/re-measured properly. ?I haven't finished yet, but
there haven't been any problems so far.

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-10  6:45 fix IMA deadlock Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-10  6:45 ` [PATCH] security/ima: use fs method to read integrity data Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-10 12:20   ` Boaz Harrosh
2017-05-10 13:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-10 15:55       ` Boaz Harrosh
2017-05-10 21:00       ` Mimi Zohar
2017-05-11  8:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-12 21:09           ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-05-10 23:59   ` James Morris
2017-06-04  5:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-05  0:23       ` James Morris
2017-06-05  1:57         ` Mimi Zohar
2017-05-11  0:34   ` Li Kun
2017-05-11  0:59     ` Al Viro
2017-05-11  4:03       ` Li Kun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1494623376.4997.28.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).