From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jlayton@redhat.com (Jeff Layton)
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:56:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 08/27] VFS: Introduce the structs and doc for a
	filesystem context [ver #5]
In-Reply-To: <9029.1497709089@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
References: <20170617095755.z623wmwgwcw76wce@thunk.org>
	<22bc3062-e860-5266-7a2d-9f5eff8b8559@schaufler-ca.com>
	<149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<149745339478.10897.13154531822843514976.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<1402.1497472929@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<77078d8b-e8dc-5cd2-2f09-1e796d8e0e2c@schaufler-ca.com>
	<9029.1497709089@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1497711392.4684.11.camel@redhat.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 15:18 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know that this is a hard and fast rule.  Struct bio uses a
> > "bi_" prefix (e.g., bi_error, bi_opf, bi_iter, etc.).
> 
> Linus told me to stop doing it.
> 
> David


That's a pity... I tend to like little prefixes on fields too. Trying to
find all occurrences of a symbol called "flags" in cscope is a losing
exercise.

Do you have a reference to the discussion so I can understand the
rationale there?

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html