From: keescook@chromium.org (Kees Cook)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_KILL_PROCESS
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 20:19:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501730353-46840-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
This series is the result of Fabricio and I going around a few times
on possible solutions for finding a way to enhance RET_KILL to kill
the process group. There's a lot of ways this could be done, but I
wanted something that felt cleanest. As it happens, Tyler's recent
patch series for logging improvement also needs to know a litte bit
more during filter runs, and the solution for both is to pass back
the matched filter. This lets us examine it here for RET_KILL and
in the future for logging changes.
The filter passing is patch 1, the new flag for RET_KILL is patch 2.
Some test refactoring is in patch 3 for the RET_DATA ordering, and
patch 4 is the test for the new RET_KILL flag.
Please take a look!
Thanks,
-Kees
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 3:19 Kees Cook [this message]
2017-08-03 3:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection Kees Cook
[not found] ` <b1441a9f-acf0-3133-d70e-ea62564cc321@canonical.com>
2017-08-08 1:46 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-03 3:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_KILL_PROCESS Kees Cook
[not found] ` <84366abd-bf72-83be-ce42-be5332300eb2@canonical.com>
2017-08-08 1:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-03 3:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/seccomp: Refactor RET_ERRNO tests Kees Cook
2017-08-03 3:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/seccomp: Test thread vs process killing Kees Cook
[not found] ` <2185ad3f-2a08-09b9-2df6-1fa5853506d7@canonical.com>
2017-08-08 1:37 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501730353-46840-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).