From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:34:05 -0400 Subject: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 In-Reply-To: <20170911063834.GB10489@infradead.org> References: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> <20170910081047.GA19533@infradead.org> <1505052162.3224.64.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170911063834.GB10489@infradead.org> Message-ID: <1505165645.3470.1.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 23:38 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:02:42AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > We need to differentiate between policies and x509 certificates. ?In > > the policy case, they need to be signed and appraised, while in the > > x509 certificate case, the certificate itself is signed so the file > > doesn't need to be signed or verified. > > How about you take this sketch over - I don't know much about the > integrity code, and it seems like you actually wrote > kernel_read_file_from_path as well - so you're at least 3 times as > qualified as I am in this area.. Sure, it's been on my to do list. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html