From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar) Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:46:22 -0500 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode In-Reply-To: References: <1509382827.3583.143.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1508774387.3639.128.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <750.1509378910@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3691.1509383138@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1509385178.3583.159.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1510173982.4484.30.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing Stephen Rothwell] On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:25 +1100, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > James is staging the subsystem patches independently of each other, in > > case of a similar problem, so that they can be pulled separately. > > ?There's a new "next-general" branch. > > If you send me a pull request, I'm combining branches into next-testing, > too, which is pulled into -next. linux-next already has the IMA patches, which might be confusing. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html