From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] IMA: Support using new creds in appraisal policy
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:48:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511902135.3473.5.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171026084055.25482-2-mjg59@google.com>
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 01:40 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The existing BPRM_CHECK functionality in IMA validates against the
> credentials of the existing process, not any new credentials that the
> child process may transition to. Add an additional CREDS_CHECK target
> and refactor IMA to pass the appropriate creds structure. In
> ima_bprm_check(), check with both the existing process credentials and
> the credentials that will be committed when the new process is started.
> This will not change behaviour unless the system policy is extended to
> include CREDS_CHECK targets - BPRM_CHECK will continue to check the same
> credentials that it did previously.
< snip >
> @@ -305,7 +304,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
> case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
> case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
> - security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
> + security_cred_getsecid(cred, &sid);
> rc = security_filter_rule_match(sid,
> rule->lsm[i].type,
> Audit_equal,
Based on the patch description, I wouldn't expect to see any changes
here, unless this is wrong to begin with. ?In which case, it should be
a separate patch.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 8:40 [PATCH V3 1/2] security: Add a cred_getsecid hook Matthew Garrett
2017-10-26 8:40 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] IMA: Support using new creds in appraisal policy Matthew Garrett
2017-10-26 9:11 ` James Morris
2017-11-28 20:48 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-11-28 21:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-11-28 21:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-28 21:37 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-11-28 22:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-15 22:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-12-15 22:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-12-18 15:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 9:04 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] security: Add a cred_getsecid hook James Morris
2017-10-26 13:21 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-30 10:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-26 14:20 ` Stephen Smalley
2017-10-30 10:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-30 17:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2017-11-14 19:42 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511902135.3473.5.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).