From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jlayton@kernel.org (Jeff Layton) Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:16:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] integrity: get rid of unneeded initializations in integrity_iint_cache entries In-Reply-To: <1512657347.3527.48.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170706145421.13223-1-jlayton@kernel.org> <20170706150424.GA21489@mail.hallyn.com> <1499370226.3130.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1512648098.1350.6.camel@kernel.org> <1512657347.3527.48.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1512659813.1350.18.camel@kernel.org> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 09:35 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 07:01 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:43 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 10:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Jeff Layton (jlayton at kernel.org): > > > > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > > > > > > > The init_once routine memsets the whole object to 0, and then > > > > > explicitly sets some of the fields to 0 again. Just remove the explicit > > > > > initializations. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn > > > > > > Thanks, queued. > > > > > > Mimi > > > > > > > Hi Mimi, > > > > I notice that this patch hasn't made the last couple of releases. Was it > > dropped for some reason? > > Thanks for the reminder. I accidentally dropped it (and Sascha > Hauer's patch). The subject line is too long. Assuming you don't > object, I'll replace the "get rid of" with "removed" and queue the > patch in the next-queued-testing branch. > > Mimi > Sounds good. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html