From: zohar@linux.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] ima: prevent kexec_load syscall based on runtime secureboot flag
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:33:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538048015.3459.76.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180926122210.14642-3-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Cc'ing the kexec mailing list, and Seth]
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 17:52 +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
> When CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, the kexec_file_load syscall
> requires the kexec'd kernel image to be signed. Distros are concerned
> about totally disabling the kexec_load syscall. As a compromise, the
> kexec_load syscall will only be disabled when CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG
> is configured and the system is booted with secureboot enabled.
>
> This patch disables the kexec_load syscall only for systems booted with
> secureboot enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Nice!
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index dce0a8a217bb..bdb6e5563d05 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -505,20 +505,24 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
> */
> int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
> {
> - bool sig_enforce;
> + bool ima_enforce, sig_enforce;
>
> - if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) != IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)
> - return 0;
> + ima_enforce =
> + (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) == IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
>
> switch (id) {
> case LOADING_KEXEC_IMAGE:
> - if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG
> + if (arch_ima_get_secureboot())
> + return -EACCES;
> +#endif
> + if (ima_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC)) {
> pr_err("impossible to appraise a kernel image without a file descriptor; try using kexec_file_load syscall.\n");
> return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
> }
> break;
> case LOADING_FIRMWARE:
> - if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE) {
> + if (ima_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE)) {
> pr_err("Prevent firmware sysfs fallback loading.\n");
> return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
> }
> @@ -526,7 +530,8 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
> case LOADING_MODULE:
> sig_enforce = is_module_sig_enforced();
>
> - if (!sig_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES)) {
> + if (ima_enforce && (!sig_enforce
> + && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES))) {
> pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
> return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-27 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-26 12:22 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for architecture specific IMA policies Nayna Jain
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/ima: define arch_ima_get_secureboot Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 11:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] ima: prevent kexec_load syscall based on runtime secureboot flag Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 11:33 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] ima: refactor ima_init_policy() Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 12:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-09-28 0:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ima: add support for arch specific policies Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 13:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] ima: add support for external setting of ima_appraise Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 13:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-10-05 17:44 ` Nayna Jain
2018-09-26 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/ima: define arch_get_ima_policy() for x86 Nayna Jain
2018-09-27 13:31 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1538048015.3459.76.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).