From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: prakhar srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec_buffer measure
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 11:48:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556812101.4134.28.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555978681.4914.305.camel@linux.ibm.com>
[Cc'ing Paul, John, Casey]
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 20:18 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> [Cc'ing LSM mailing list]
>
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:30 -0700, prakhar srivastava wrote:
>
> > 2) Adding a LSM hook
> > We are doing both the command line and kernel version measurement in IMA.
> > Can you please elaborate on how this can be used outside of the scenario?
> > That will help me come back with a better design and code. I am
> > neutral about this.
>
> As I said previously, initially you might want to only measure the
> kexec boot command line, but will you ever want to verify or audit log
> the boot command line hash? Perhaps LSMs would be interested in the
> boot command line. Should this be an LSM hook?
From an LSM perspective, is there any interest in the boot command line?
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAEFn8qKkXgxUKtribbtFwvG9NykGQo10jQ5Du_i9wJz-wKreOA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-04-23 0:18 ` [PATCH] kexec_buffer measure Mimi Zohar
2019-05-02 15:48 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-05-02 16:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-02 16:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-03 0:53 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-05-03 14:24 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1556812101.4134.28.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).