* [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static
@ 2019-06-11 13:40 YueHaibing
2019-06-13 15:38 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2019-06-11 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zohar, dmitry.kasatkin, jmorris, serge
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-security-module, linux-integrity, YueHaibing
Fix sparse warning:
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1cc822a..cd1b728 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
};
/* An array of architecture specific rules */
-struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
+static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static
2019-06-11 13:40 [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static YueHaibing
@ 2019-06-13 15:38 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2019-06-13 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing, dmitry.kasatkin, jmorris, serge
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-security-module, linux-integrity
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 21:40 +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
> symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Thanks, this patch has been queued to be upstreamed.
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 1cc822a..cd1b728 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
> };
>
> /* An array of architecture specific rules */
> -struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
> +static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
>
> static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
> static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-13 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-11 13:40 [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static YueHaibing
2019-06-13 15:38 ` Mimi Zohar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).