linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: dynamically allocate shash_desc
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:44:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1560861878.9530.17.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1Q2JG3KBYNYgWg0_XtGUufNc6zuqcUBqiGSaBRp+au-w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 22:08 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:08 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:55 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 13:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On 32-bit ARM, we get a warning about excessive stack usage when
> > > > building with clang.
> > > >
> > > > security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:504:5: error: stack frame size
> > > > of 1152 bytes in function 'ima_calc_field_array_hash' [-Werror,-
> > > > Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >
> > > I'm definitely not seeing this.  Is this problem a result of non
> > > upstreamed patches?  For sha1, currently the only possible hash
> > > algorithm, I'm seeing 664.
> 
> You won't see it with gcc, only with clang in some randconfig builds,
> I suppose only when KASAN is enabled.
> 
> > Every time a measurement is added to the measurement list, the memory
> > would be allocated/freed.  The frequency of new measurements is policy
> > dependent.  For performance reasons, I'd prefer if the allocation
> > remains on the stack.
> 
> Is there a way to preallocate the shash_desc instead? That would
> avoid the overhead.

There are 3 other SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK definitions in just
ima_crypto.c, with a total of ~55 other places in the kernel.  Before
fixing this particular function, I'd like to know if the "excessive
stack usage" warning is limited to ima_calc_field_array_hash_tfm().
 If so, what is so special about its usage of SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK?

thanks,

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-18 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 11:20 [PATCH] ima: dynamically allocate shash_desc Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-17 18:07   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-17 20:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18 12:44       ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-06-18 18:06         ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18 18:53           ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1560861878.9530.17.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).