From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, revest@google.com,
allison@lohutok.net, armijn@tjaldur.nl, bauerman@linux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: Expose data structures required for include/linux/integrity.h
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:43:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1576694616.4579.412.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63f057fb98351324c8fc6210c42f3cbd76e85a68.camel@chromium.org>
On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 17:56 +0100, Florent Revest wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 09:28 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > [Cc'ing Matthew]
> >
> > > There's a major difference between returning just the file hash and
> > > making the integrity_iint_cache structure public.
>
> Certainly!
> I am new to this subsystem so I just wanted to get the discussion
> started. I am happy to make a more specific function.
>
> > > Peter Moody's original code queried the cache[1]. Why do you need
> > > access to the structure itself?
> > > FYI, if/when we get to IMA namespacing, the cache structure will
> > > change.
> > >
> > > [1] ima: add the ability to query ima for the hash of a given file.
> >
> > If you're using Peter's patch, or something similar, I'd appreciate
> > your taking the time to upstream it.
>
> Thank you for pointing me to Peter's patch! No one in my team was aware
> of his work on this. Ugh!
> It appears that Peter left the company while trying to upstream his
> patch and the situation just got stuck there for 4+ years now.
>
> If you are still positive about the idea of a ima_file_hash function, I
> will take his v6 patch (this is the latest I could find on the
> sourceforce archives of linux-ima-devel), rebase it, take your comments
> into account and send a new version by the end of the week.
Matthew also wasn't aware of Peter's patch, until I sent it to him. I
assume they're using it or something similar. Please coordinate with
him, before refreshing and posting the patch.
thanks,
Mimi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-17 13:47 [PATCH] integrity: Expose data structures required for include/linux/integrity.h Florent Revest
2019-12-17 16:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-12-17 23:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-18 11:03 ` Florent Revest
2019-12-18 13:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-18 14:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-18 16:56 ` Florent Revest
2019-12-18 18:43 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1576694616.4579.412.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=armijn@tjaldur.nl \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).