linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, audit@vger.kernel.org,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v10 09/17] ipe: add permissive toggle
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:09:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1687986571-16823-10-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1687986571-16823-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

IPE, like SELinux, supports a permissive mode. This mode allows policy
authors to test and evaluate IPE policy without it effecting their
programs. When the mode is changed, a 1404 AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
be reported.

This patch adds the following audit records:

    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1
    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=1 old_enforcing=0 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1

The audit record only emit when the value from the user input is
different from the current enforce value.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

---
v2:
  + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
    and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
    interface to pass mailing list character limit

v3:
  + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
  + Remove useless 0-initializations
  + Prefix extern variables with ipe_
  + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
    exposed through sysctls.
  + Add more prose to the IPE base config option
    help text.
  + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
  + Remove unnecessary caching system.
  + Remove comments from headers
  + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
  + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
  + Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12

v4:
  + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
  + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
    exposed through securityfs.
  + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.

v5:
  + fix minor grammatical errors
  + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
    reconstruct the exact rule.

v6:
  + No changes

v7:
  + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
    evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.
  + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the
    evaluation loop.
  + Split out permissive functionality into a separate patch for easier
    review.
  + Remove permissive switch compile-time configuration option - this
    is trivial to add later.

v8:
  + Remove "IPE" prefix from permissive audit record
  + align fields to the linux-audit field dictionary. This causes the
    following fields to change:
      enforce -> permissive

  + Remove duplicated information correlated with syscall record, that
    will always be present in the audit event.
  + Change audit types:
    + AUDIT_TRUST_STATUS -> AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
      + There is no significant difference in meaning between
        these types.

v9:
  + Clean up ipe_context related code

v10:
  + Change audit format to comform with the existing format selinux is
    using
  + Remove the audit record emission during init to align with selinux,
    which does not perform this action.
---
 security/ipe/audit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++
 security/ipe/audit.h |  1 +
 security/ipe/eval.c  |  9 ++++++
 security/ipe/eval.h  |  1 +
 security/ipe/fs.c    | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.c b/security/ipe/audit.c
index d3f78a7fc93f..08f855f70f76 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.c
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.c
@@ -195,3 +195,25 @@ void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p)
 
 	audit_log_end(ab);
 }
+
+/**
+ * ipe_audit_enforce - Audit a change in IPE's enforcement state.
+ * @new_enforce: The new value enforce to be set.
+ * @old_enforce: The old value currently in enforce.
+ */
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce)
+{
+	struct audit_buffer *ab;
+
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_STATUS);
+	if (!ab)
+		return;
+
+	audit_log_format(ab, "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u"
+			 " enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1",
+			 new_enforce, old_enforce,
+			 from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)),
+			 audit_get_sessionid(current));
+
+	audit_log_end(ab);
+}
diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.h b/security/ipe/audit.h
index 0ff5a06808de..914f001e5286 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.h
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.h
@@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ void ipe_audit_match(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx,
 void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p);
 void ipe_audit_policy_activation(const struct ipe_policy *const op,
 				 const struct ipe_policy *const np);
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce);
 
 #endif /* _IPE_AUDIT_H */
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c
index 2cb43ad92a65..2d4b3a6d7b7a 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.c
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 
 struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 bool success_audit;
+bool enforce = true;
 
 static const struct super_block *pinned_sb;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pin_lock);
@@ -116,6 +117,7 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 	bool match = false;
+	bool enforcing = true;
 	enum ipe_action_type action;
 	enum ipe_match match_type;
 	struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL;
@@ -131,6 +133,8 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	enforcing = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+
 	if (ctx->op == __IPE_OP_INVALID) {
 		action = pol->parsed->global_default_action;
 		match_type = __IPE_MATCH_GLOBAL;
@@ -167,6 +171,9 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 	if (action == __IPE_ACTION_DENY)
 		rc = -EACCES;
 
+	if (!enforcing)
+		rc = 0;
+
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -196,3 +203,5 @@ void ipe_invalidate_pinned_sb(const struct super_block *mnt_sb)
 
 module_param(success_audit, bool, 0400);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(success_audit, "Start IPE with success auditing enabled");
+module_param(enforce, bool, 0400);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enforce, "Start IPE in enforce or permissive mode");
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h
index 8fcdb2ea19f4..15c35921fd4d 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.h
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 
 extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 extern bool success_audit;
+extern bool enforce;
 
 struct ipe_eval_ctx {
 	enum ipe_op_type op;
diff --git a/security/ipe/fs.c b/security/ipe/fs.c
index 6bd2aa84831b..1761d39e4d04 100644
--- a/security/ipe/fs.c
+++ b/security/ipe/fs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ static struct dentry *np __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *root __ro_after_init;
 struct dentry *policy_root __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *audit_node __ro_after_init;
+static struct dentry *enforce_node __ro_after_init;
 
 /**
  * setaudit - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/success_audit"
@@ -68,6 +69,61 @@ static ssize_t getaudit(struct file *f, char __user *data,
 	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
 }
 
+/**
+ * setenforce - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the write syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t setenforce(struct file *f, const char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+	bool new_value, old_value;
+
+	if (!file_ns_capable(f, &init_user_ns, CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	old_value = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+	new_value = old_value;
+	rc = kstrtobool_from_user(data, len, &new_value);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	if (new_value != old_value) {
+		ipe_audit_enforce(new_value, old_value);
+		WRITE_ONCE(enforce, new_value);
+	}
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+/**
+ * getenforce - Read handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the read syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t getenforce(struct file *f, char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	const char *result;
+
+	result = ((READ_ONCE(enforce)) ? "1" : "0");
+
+	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
+}
+
 /**
  * new_policy - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/new_policy".
  * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
@@ -121,6 +177,11 @@ static const struct file_operations audit_fops = {
 	.read = getaudit,
 };
 
+static const struct file_operations enforce_fops = {
+	.write = setenforce,
+	.read = getenforce,
+};
+
 /**
  * ipe_init_securityfs - Initialize IPE's securityfs tree at fsinit.
  *
@@ -148,6 +209,13 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	enforce_node = securityfs_create_file("enforce", 0600, root, NULL,
+					      &enforce_fops);
+	if (IS_ERR(enforce_node)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(enforce_node);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	policy_root = securityfs_create_dir("policies", root);
 	if (IS_ERR(policy_root)) {
 		rc = PTR_ERR(policy_root);
@@ -164,6 +232,7 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 err:
 	securityfs_remove(np);
 	securityfs_remove(policy_root);
+	securityfs_remove(enforce_node);
 	securityfs_remove(audit_node);
 	securityfs_remove(root);
 	return rc;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 21:09 [RFC PATCH v10 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 01/17] security: add ipe lsm Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 1/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <ffd5c67f4a9bf45df0ce95a8fe0932a3.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-13 23:31     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 02/17] ipe: add policy parser Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 2/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <b2abfd3883dce682ee911413fea2ec66.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-14  4:18     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 03/17] ipe: add evaluation loop Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 3/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <309cfd62a474a7e93be6a0886a3d5aa8.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-14 20:28     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 04/17] ipe: add LSM hooks on execution and kernel read Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 4/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <cbe877b3905033d2b8c7c92e6d0cad4e.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-14 21:47     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 05/17] ipe: introduce 'boot_verified' as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 5/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <7b0f16fd49fb3490af1018eba986d0e4.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-14 23:56     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 06/17] security: add new securityfs delete function Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 6/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <80ae988288d2ac277a4429e85524a9bb.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-14 23:59     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 07/17] ipe: add userspace interface Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:36   ` [PATCH RFC v10 7/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <fcc5de3f153eb60b5acf799c159e6ec8.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-15  3:26     ` Fan Wu
2023-08-01 19:29       ` Paul Moore
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 08/17] uapi|audit|ipe: add ipe auditing support Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:37   ` [PATCH RFC v10 8/17] " Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <ec09144af7c7109d8b457ceccd50ba7a.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-15  3:57     ` Fan Wu
2023-08-01 19:24       ` Paul Moore
2023-06-28 21:09 ` Fan Wu [this message]
2023-07-08  5:37   ` [PATCH RFC v10 9/17] ipe: add permissive toggle Paul Moore
     [not found]   ` <85af33c02638ebb501b40fd0f3785b12.paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-15  4:00     ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 10/17] block|security: add LSM blob to block_device Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 11/17] dm-verity: consume root hash digest and signature data via LSM hook Fan Wu
2023-07-07 14:53   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-07-12  3:43     ` Fan Wu
2023-07-25 20:43       ` Paul Moore
2023-08-08 22:45         ` Fan Wu
2023-08-08 23:40           ` Alasdair G Kergon
2023-08-09 18:02             ` Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 12/17] ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-07-08  5:37   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 13/17] fsverity: consume builtin signature via LSM hook Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 14/17] ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 15/17] scripts: add boot policy generation program Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 16/17] ipe: kunit test for parser Fan Wu
2023-06-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v10 17/17] documentation: add ipe documentation Fan Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1687986571-16823-10-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).