linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	peterhuewe@gmx.de, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	jgg@ziepe.ca, bhe@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	jmorris@namei.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	serge@hallyn.com,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Sush Shringarputale <sushring@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2] IMA Log Snapshotting Design Proposal
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:37:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f7bdb13-859e-46ce-b327-8043e7dbd598@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c0c32d5-e636-2a0e-5bdf-538c904ceea3@linux.microsoft.com>

On 10/19/2023 2:49 PM, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>    f. A new event, "snapshot_aggregate", will be computed and measured
>         in the IMA log as part of this feature.  It should help the
>         remote-attestation client/service to benefit from the IMA log
>         snapshot feature.
>         The "snapshot_aggregate" event is described in more details in
>         section "D.1 Snapshot Aggregate Event" below.

What is the use case for the snapshot aggregate?  My thinking is:

1. The platform must retain the entire measurement list.  Early 
measurements can never be discarded because a new quote verifier
must receive the entire log starting at the first measurement.

In this case, isn't the snapshot aggregate redundant?

2. There is a disadvantage to redundant data.  The verifier must support 
this new event type. It receives this event and must validate the 
aggregate against the snapshot-ed events. This is an attack surface. 
The attacker can send an aggregate and snapshot-ed measurements that do 
not match to exploit a flaw in the verifier.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-31 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-19 18:49 [RFC V2] IMA Log Snapshotting Design Proposal Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-31 18:37 ` Ken Goldman [this message]
2023-11-13 18:14   ` Sush Shringarputale
2023-10-31 19:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-16 22:28   ` Paul Moore
2023-11-22  1:01     ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-22  1:18       ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-22  4:27     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-22 13:18       ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-22 14:22         ` Paul Moore
2023-11-27 17:07           ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-27 22:16             ` Paul Moore
2023-11-28 12:09               ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-29  1:06                 ` Paul Moore
2023-11-29  2:07                   ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-06 23:27                     ` Paul Moore
2024-01-07 12:58                       ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-08  2:58                         ` Paul Moore
2024-01-08 11:48                           ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-08 17:15                             ` Paul Moore
2023-12-20 22:13           ` Ken Goldman
2024-01-06 23:44             ` Paul Moore
2023-11-13 18:59 ` Stefan Berger
2023-11-14 18:36   ` Sush Shringarputale
2023-11-14 18:58     ` Stefan Berger
2023-11-16 22:07       ` Paul Moore
2023-11-16 22:41         ` Stefan Berger
2023-11-16 22:56           ` Paul Moore
2023-11-17 22:41             ` Sush Shringarputale
2023-11-20 20:03         ` Tushar Sugandhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f7bdb13-859e-46ce-b327-8043e7dbd598@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sushring@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).