From: ebiggers3@gmail.com (Eric Biggers)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] key: Convert big_key payload.data to struct
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 14:45:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170509214526.GB87747@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13867.1494314658@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 08:24:18AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It probably would be easier to kmalloc() this struct and store a pointer to
> > it in key->payload.data[0]
>
> Yeah, but it's a waste of resources if you don't have to do it.
>
> David
Yes, but it seems very much like a micro-optimization, which isn't helpful when
the code contains undefined behavior and is creating problems. This is the
*big* key type, after all; shouldn't the amount of data in the key normally be
large enough to make a kmalloc() of 24 bytes insignificant?
And besides, I expect that most users don't even use the big_keys feature. If
we actually want to avoid wasting resources that aren't used, we shouldn't
allocate the crypto_rng and crypto_skcipher until someone tries to create a
big_key. (Currently they're allocated unconditionally in big_key_init().)
- Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-09 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-08 21:43 [PATCH] key: Convert big_key payload.data to struct Kees Cook
2017-05-08 22:00 ` David Howells
2017-05-08 22:19 ` Eric Biggers
2017-05-08 22:26 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-09 7:24 ` David Howells
2017-05-09 21:45 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2017-05-09 8:11 ` David Howells
2017-05-09 16:12 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170509214526.GB87747@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).