From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not run tpm2_shutdown
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:09:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170525200931.GA12733@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6c024ae-fe93-251a-a176-1f27f25b1e21@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:04:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 11:50 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:12:36AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>The tpm2_shutdown does not work with the VTPM proxy driver since the
> >>function only gets called when the backend file descriptor is already
> >>closed and at this point no data can be sent anymore. A proper shutdown
> >>would have to be initated by a user space application, such as a container
> >>management stack, that sends the command via the character device before
> >>terminating the TPM emulator.
> >>
> >>To avoid the tpm2_shutdown we introduce a TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SHUTDOWN flag
> >>that only the VTPM proxy driver sets. This also avoids misleading kernel
> >>log messages.
> >This seems strange to me..
> >
> >Why isn't ops null if the fd has gone away?
> >
> >What is the call flow that hits this?
>
> In this function here.
>
> static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
>
> /* Make the chip unavailable. */
> mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, NULL, chip->dev_num);
> mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
>
> /* Make the driver uncallable. */
> down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
> chip->ops = NULL;
> up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> }
>
> The request cannot be deliver because the anonymous fd has been closed
> already.
The driver must always be able to process requests until
tpm_del_char_device completes, so this is triggering an existing bug
in vtpm. This change in core behvior is not going to fix the bug.
eg a request from sysfs/etc could come in between vtpm fd closure and
tpm_del_char_device, and it still must be handled properly.
I guess you need to have transmit command fail fast once the fd is
closed.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-25 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 13:12 [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not run tpm2_shutdown Stefan Berger
2017-05-25 15:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 20:04 ` Stefan Berger
2017-05-25 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-05-25 20:32 ` Stefan Berger
2017-05-25 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 20:54 ` Stefan Berger
2017-05-25 21:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 22:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-05-25 23:34 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170525200931.GA12733@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).