From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:49:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5] In-Reply-To: <9141.1497624810@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20170616090621.GA13775@infradead.org> <149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149745338248.10897.17175227466711674034.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20170615093927.GG31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9141.1497624810@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: <20170616154959.GA27209@infradead.org> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:53:30PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > It might be good to just introduce the internal flags field first, > > Internal flags field? Did you mean Al's suggested sb_readonly() wrapper? (1) Add a new SB field that is like s_flags but for the new flags, (2) switch users over to the new field (3) remove s_flags -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html