From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: serge@hallyn.com (Serge E. Hallyn) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:01:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces In-Reply-To: <87o9spfa5v.fsf@xmission.com> References: <1499785511-17192-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1499785511-17192-2-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87mv89iy7q.fsf@xmission.com> <20170712170346.GA17974@mail.hallyn.com> <87o9spfa5v.fsf@xmission.com> Message-ID: <20170713010137.GA23575@mail.hallyn.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm at xmission.com): > James Morris writes: > > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm at xmission.com): > >> > Stefan Berger <"Stefan Bergerstefanb"@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > >> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > >> > > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn > >> > > >> > It doesn't look like this is coming through Serge so I don't see how > >> > the Signed-off-by tag is legtimate. > >> > >> This is mostly explained by the fact that there have been a *lot* of > >> changes, many of them discussed in private emails. I wasn't clear here. There were a lot of changes between the first mention of the approach and the posting of v1. My point was that I did in fact agree to Reviewed-by, and the fact that I've found a few more things to point out only reflects my missing them before. I don't think my name is being mis-used. > > Please try and keep technical discussions public or at least document them > > when reposting the patches. > > Yes please. > > A public discussion helps to understand what the challenges are. Yes, all discussion (that I can find in my mbox) since v1 has been public. -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html