From: serge@hallyn.com (Serge E. Hallyn)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 06/10] capabilities: move audit log decision to function
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:18:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824161839.GF10515@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ef18e4236773f4ccd55f9b47639adb6a992d104.1503459890.git.rgb@redhat.com>
Quoting Richard Guy Briggs (rgb at redhat.com):
> Move the audit log decision logic to its own function to isolate the
> complexity in one place.
>
> Suggested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> ---
> security/commoncap.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 1af7dec..5d81354 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,32 @@ static inline bool is_setuid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old)
> static inline bool is_setgid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old)
> { return !gid_eq(new->egid, old->gid); }
>
> +/*
> + * Audit candidate if current->cap_effective is set
> + *
> + * We do not bother to audit if 3 things are true:
> + * 1) cap_effective has all caps
> + * 2) we are root
> + * 3) root is supposed to have all caps (SECURE_NOROOT)
> + * Since this is just a normal root execing a process.
> + *
> + * Number 1 above might fail if you don't have a full bset, but I think
> + * that is interesting information to audit.
> + */
> +static inline bool nonroot_raised_pE(struct cred *cred, kuid_t root)
> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + if (cap_grew(effective, ambient, cred)) {
> + if (!cap_full(effective, cred) ||
> + !is_eff(root, cred) || !is_real(root, cred) ||
> + !root_privileged()) {
> + ret = true;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
> * @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
> @@ -614,26 +640,10 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>
> bprm->cap_effective = effective;
>
> - /*
> - * Audit candidate if current->cap_effective is set
> - *
> - * We do not bother to audit if 3 things are true:
> - * 1) cap_effective has all caps
> - * 2) we are root
> - * 3) root is supposed to have all caps (SECURE_NOROOT)
> - * Since this is just a normal root execing a process.
> - *
> - * Number 1 above might fail if you don't have a full bset, but I think
> - * that is interesting information to audit.
> - */
> - if (cap_grew(effective, ambient, new)) {
> - if (!cap_full(effective, new) ||
> - !is_eff(root_uid, new) || !is_real(root_uid, new) ||
> - !root_privileged()) {
> - ret = audit_log_bprm_fcaps(bprm, new, old);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (nonroot_raised_pE(new, root_uid)) {
> + ret = audit_log_bprm_fcaps(bprm, new, old);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> }
>
> new->securebits &= ~issecure_mask(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS);
> --
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 10:12 [PATCH V3 00/10] capabilities: do not audit log BPRM_FCAPS on set*id Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 01/10] capabilities: factor out cap_bprm_set_creds privileged root Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 15:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:55 ` James Morris
2017-08-25 10:49 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 02/10] capabilities: intuitive names for cap gain status Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:03 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-24 16:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-24 19:06 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-24 21:17 ` Paul Moore
2017-08-28 9:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-28 11:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-09-01 10:18 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-09-02 5:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-09-04 6:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-09-05 6:45 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-25 5:56 ` James Morris
2017-08-25 15:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-25 18:47 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 03/10] capabilities: rename has_cap to has_fcap Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:56 ` James Morris
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 04/10] capabilities: use root_priveleged inline to clarify logic Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:14 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:58 ` James Morris
2017-08-28 12:03 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-31 14:49 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 05/10] capabilities: use intuitive names for id changes Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:59 ` James Morris
2017-08-25 15:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-25 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 19:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-25 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-28 1:32 ` James Morris
2017-08-28 9:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-28 20:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 06/10] capabilities: move audit log decision to function Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2017-08-25 6:01 ` James Morris
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 07/10] capabilities: remove a layer of conditional logic Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:47 ` James Morris
2017-08-25 15:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-25 18:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-23 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 08/10] capabilities: invert logic for clarity Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:23 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:47 ` James Morris
2017-08-23 10:13 ` [PATCH V3 09/10] capabilities: fix logic for effective root or real root Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-24 16:44 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:47 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:48 ` James Morris
2017-08-23 10:13 ` [PATCH V3 10/10] capabilities: audit log other surprising conditions Richard Guy Briggs
2017-08-24 16:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-08-25 5:50 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824161839.GF10515@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).