From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:22:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] tpm: use tpm_msleep() value as max delay In-Reply-To: <20171017203232.2262-5-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171017203232.2262-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171017203232.2262-5-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20171019142207.fviqxmpfwsvmd3rw@linux.intel.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:32PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote: > Currently, tpm_msleep() uses delay_msec as the minimum value in > usleep_range. However, that is the maximum time we want to wait. > The function is modified to use the delay_msec as the maximum > value, not the minimum value. > > After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte > burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~9sec to ~8sec. > > Fixes: 3b9af007869("tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM 1.2/ > 2.0 generic drivers") > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain > Acked-by: Mimi Zohar > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > index 4fc83ac7abeb..644de70de2cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > @@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ int tpm_pm_resume(struct device *dev); > > static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec) > { > - usleep_range(delay_msec * 1000, > - (delay_msec * 1000) + TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US); > + usleep_range((delay_msec * 1000) - TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US, > + delay_msec * 1000); > }; > > struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int chip_num); > -- > 2.13.3 > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html