From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: remove chip_num parameter from in-kernel API
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:27:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024222741.lqvgpdaosjazpvfd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024185208.GD1806@obsidianresearch.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:52:08PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:38:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > The reasoning is simple and obvious. Since every call site passes the
> > value TPM_ANY_NUM (0xFFFF) the parameter does not have right to exist.
> > Refined the documentation of the corresponding functions.
>
> I like this patch, but how about a slightly different take, make this
> change instead:
>
> -struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int chip_num)
> +struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(struct tpm_chip *chip);
>
> Where chip == NULL means the default TPM.
>
> And then at all call sites swap TPM_ANY_NUM to NULL and instead of
> flowing an 'int chip_num' to tpm_chip_find_get, flow the 'struct
> tpm_chip *' directly.
>
> This gets us much closer to the desired API with about the same amount
> of churn as this patch has.
>
> Jason
I can do that. I will rework this as a patch set that includes this
proposal. Gives us more clean position to continue. Thank you.
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-23 12:38 [PATCH] tpm: remove chip_num parameter from in-kernel API Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-23 14:07 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2017-10-23 16:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 15:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-24 15:51 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 16:07 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 16:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 16:14 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 17:56 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 17:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-10-24 17:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 17:44 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 18:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-10-24 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-24 18:40 ` Peter Huewe
2017-10-24 16:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-24 16:35 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-25 14:51 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-25 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-26 16:23 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-10-24 14:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-24 18:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 22:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024222741.lqvgpdaosjazpvfd@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).