linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dchinner@redhat.com (Dave Chinner)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v16 0/6] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:36:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221013636.GE3728@rh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220235600.GA3706@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:56:00PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:36:04AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm not wanting to use it to replace static variables. All the
> > structures are dynamically allocated right now, and get assigned to
> > other dynamically allocated pointers. I'd likely split the current
> > structures into a "ro after init" structure and rw structure, so
> > how does the "__ro_after_init" attribute work in that case? Is it
> > something like this?
> > 
> > struct xfs_mount {
> > 	struct xfs_mount_ro{
> > 		.......
> > 	} *ro __ro_after_init;
       ^^^^^^^^

pointer, not embedded structure....

> > 	......
> 
> No, you'd do:
> 
> struct xfs_mount_ro {
> 	[...]
> };
> 
> struct xfs_mount {
> 	const struct xfs_mount_ro *ro;
> 	[...]
> };

.... so that's pretty much the same thing :P

> > Also, what compile time checks are in place to catch writes to
> > ro structure members? Is sparse going to be able to check this sort
> > of thing, like is does with endian-specific variables?
> 
> Just labelling the pointer const should be enough for the compiler to
> catch unintended writes.

Ok.

> > > I'd be interested to have your review of the pmalloc API, if you think
> > > something is missing, once I send out the next revision.
> > 
> > I'll look at it in more depth when it comes past again. :P
> 
> I think the key question is whether you want a slab-style interface
> or whether you want a kmalloc-style interface.  I'd been assuming
> the former, but Igor has implemented the latter already.

Slabs are rally only useful when you have lots of a specific type of
object. I'm concerned mostly about one-off per-mount point
structures, of which there are relatively few. A heap-like pool per
mount is fine for this.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
dchinner at redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 16:52 [RFC PATCH v16 0/6] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] genalloc: track beginning of allocations Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 23:52   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-20 17:07     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-21 22:29       ` Kees Cook
2018-02-21 22:35         ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] genalloc: selftest Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 23:50   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-20 16:59     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-21 22:28       ` Kees Cook
2018-02-22  9:14         ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-22 18:28           ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] struct page: add field for vm_struct Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] Protectable Memory Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 16:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] Pmalloc: self-test Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 23:43   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-20 16:40     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-21 22:24       ` Kees Cook
2018-02-22  9:01         ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 16:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] Documentation for Pmalloc Igor Stoppa
2018-02-12 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v16 0/6] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Kees Cook
2018-02-20  1:21   ` Dave Chinner
2018-02-20 18:03     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-20 21:36       ` Dave Chinner
2018-02-20 23:56         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-21  1:36           ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-02-21  9:56             ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-21 21:36               ` Dave Chinner
2018-02-22  8:58                 ` Igor Stoppa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180221013636.GE3728@rh \
    --to=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).