From: igor.stoppa@huawei.com (Igor Stoppa)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] Pmalloc selftest
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:06:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228200620.30026-6-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228200620.30026-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Add basic self-test functionality for pmalloc.
The testing is introduced as early as possible, right after the main
dependency, genalloc, has passed successfully, so that it can help
diagnosing failures in pmalloc users.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/test_pmalloc.h | 24 +++++++++++
init/main.c | 2 +
mm/Kconfig | 10 +++++
mm/Makefile | 1 +
mm/test_pmalloc.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/test_pmalloc.h
create mode 100644 mm/test_pmalloc.c
diff --git a/include/linux/test_pmalloc.h b/include/linux/test_pmalloc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c7e2e451c17c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/test_pmalloc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * test_pmalloc.h
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright 2018 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
+ * Author: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
+ */
+
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_TEST_PMALLOC_H
+#define __LINUX_TEST_PMALLOC_H
+
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_PROTECTABLE_MEMORY
+
+void test_pmalloc(void);
+
+#else
+
+static inline void test_pmalloc(void){};
+
+#endif
+
+#endif
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index 2bf1312fd2fe..ea44c940070a 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
#include <linux/rodata_test.h>
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <linux/test_genalloc.h>
+#include <linux/test_pmalloc.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
@@ -663,6 +664,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
mem_encrypt_init();
test_genalloc();
+ test_pmalloc();
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
if (initrd_start && !initrd_below_start_ok &&
page_to_pfn(virt_to_page((void *)initrd_start)) < min_low_pfn) {
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 016d29b9400b..47b0843b02d2 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -767,3 +767,13 @@ config PROTECTABLE_MEMORY
depends on ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
default y
+
+config TEST_PROTECTABLE_MEMORY
+ bool "Run self test for pmalloc memory allocator"
+ depends on MMU
+ depends on ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
+ select PROTECTABLE_MEMORY
+ default n
+ help
+ Tries to verify that pmalloc works correctly and that the memory
+ is effectively protected.
diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile
index 959fdbdac118..1de4be5fd0bc 100644
--- a/mm/Makefile
+++ b/mm/Makefile
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) += sparse-vmemmap.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SLOB) += slob.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) += mmu_notifier.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROTECTABLE_MEMORY) += pmalloc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_PROTECTABLE_MEMORY) += test_pmalloc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KSM) += ksm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING) += page_poison.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SLAB) += slab.o
diff --git a/mm/test_pmalloc.c b/mm/test_pmalloc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..df7ecc91c6a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/test_pmalloc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * test_pmalloc.c
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright 2018 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
+ * Author: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/pmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/test_pmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+#define SIZE_1 (PAGE_SIZE * 3)
+#define SIZE_2 1000
+
+static inline bool validate_alloc(bool expected, void *addr,
+ unsigned long size)
+{
+ bool test;
+
+ test = is_pmalloc_object(addr, size) > 0;
+ pr_notice("must be %s: %s",
+ expected ? "ok" : "no", test ? "ok" : "no");
+ return test == expected;
+}
+
+#define is_alloc_ok(variable, size) \
+ validate_alloc(true, variable, size)
+
+#define is_alloc_no(variable, size) \
+ validate_alloc(false, variable, size)
+
+void test_pmalloc(void)
+{
+ struct gen_pool *pool_unprot;
+ struct gen_pool *pool_prot;
+ void *var_prot, *var_unprot, *var_vmall;
+
+ pr_notice("pmalloc-selftest");
+ pool_unprot = pmalloc_create_pool("unprotected", 0);
+ if (unlikely(!pool_unprot))
+ goto error;
+ pool_prot = pmalloc_create_pool("protected", 0);
+ if (unlikely(!(pool_prot)))
+ goto error_release;
+
+ pr_notice("Testing allocation capability");
+ var_unprot = pmalloc(pool_unprot, SIZE_1 - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ var_prot = pmalloc(pool_prot, SIZE_1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ *(int *)var_prot = 0;
+ var_vmall = vmalloc(SIZE_2);
+
+
+ pr_notice("Test correctness of is_pmalloc_object()");
+ WARN_ON(unlikely(!is_alloc_ok(var_unprot, 10)));
+ WARN_ON(unlikely(!is_alloc_ok(var_unprot, SIZE_1)));
+ WARN_ON(unlikely(!is_alloc_ok(var_unprot, PAGE_SIZE)));
+ WARN_ON(unlikely(!is_alloc_no(var_unprot, SIZE_1 + 1)));
+ WARN_ON(unlikely(!is_alloc_no(var_vmall, 10)));
+
+
+ pfree(pool_unprot, var_unprot);
+ vfree(var_vmall);
+
+ pmalloc_protect_pool(pool_prot);
+
+ /*
+ * This will intentionally trigger a WARN, because the pool being
+ * allocated from is already protected.
+ */
+ pr_notice("Test allocation from a protected pool."
+ "Expect WARN in pmalloc");
+ if (unlikely(pmalloc(pool_prot, 10, GFP_KERNEL)))
+ WARN(true, "no memory from a protected pool");
+
+ /*
+ * This will intentionally trigger a WARN because the pool being
+ * destroyed is not protected, which is unusual and should happen
+ * on error paths only, where probably other warnings are already
+ * displayed.
+ */
+ pr_notice("pmalloc-selftest:"
+ " Expect WARN in pmalloc_pool_set_protection below.");
+ pmalloc_destroy_pool(pool_unprot);
+ pr_notice("pmalloc-selftest:"
+ "Critical point for expected WARN passed.");
+
+ /* This must not cause WARNings */
+ pr_notice("pmalloc-selftest:"
+ "Expect no WARN below.");
+ pmalloc_destroy_pool(pool_prot);
+ pr_notice("pmalloc-selftest:"
+ "Critical point for unexpected WARN passed.");
+ return;
+error_release:
+ pmalloc_destroy_pool(pool_unprot);
+error:
+ WARN(true, "Unable to allocate memory for pmalloc selftest.");
+}
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 20:06 [RFC PATCH v18 0/7] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] genalloc: track beginning of allocations Igor Stoppa
2018-03-02 16:37 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-02 16:47 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-05 19:00 ` J Freyensee
2018-03-06 17:39 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 13:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-03-06 14:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-07 14:48 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 15:46 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 17:44 ` Mike Rapoprt
2018-03-06 14:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-06 16:05 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 10:51 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest Igor Stoppa
2018-03-05 19:37 ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] struct page: add field for vm_struct Igor Stoppa
2018-03-03 2:35 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-05 20:31 ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] Protectable Memory Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 3:59 ` J Freyensee
2018-03-07 14:07 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-12 19:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-12 21:25 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` Igor Stoppa [this message]
2018-03-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] Pmalloc selftest J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] lkdtm: crash on overwriting protected pmalloc var Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 17:20 ` J Freyensee
2018-03-07 13:18 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 17:26 ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation for Pmalloc Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 13:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-03-06 17:33 ` J Freyensee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-23 14:48 [RFC PATCH v17 0/7] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2018-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] Pmalloc selftest Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 16:59 ` J Freyensee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180228200620.30026-6-igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--to=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).