From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 08:54:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] tpm: add longer timeouts for creation commands. In-Reply-To: <1520361396.10396.396.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180304121205.16934-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <20180305125642.GA3425@linux.intel.com> <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9422E21E@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20180306074932.GB3624@linux.intel.com> <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9422EFFE@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1520353933.5393.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1520361396.10396.396.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20180307085454.2c820a13@lwn.net> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 13:36:36 -0500 Mimi Zohar wrote: > I've heard that some maintainers are moving away from cover letters, > since they are not include in the git repo and are lost. If I get a patch series with a cover letter that should be preserved, I apply the series in a branch then do a no-ff merge; the cover letter can then go into the merge commit. There's no reason why cover letters need to be lost. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html