From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:42:21 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 05/23] TPM: Use struct tpm_chip rather than chip number as interface parameter In-Reply-To: <153486704294.13066.8818198038331415342.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <153486700916.13066.12870860668352070081.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <153486704294.13066.8818198038331415342.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: <20180824074221.GF3584@linux.intel.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:57:22PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Use struct tpm_chip rather than chip number as interface parameter for most > interface functions. This allows the client to be sure about the consistency > of what device it uses. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 76 ++++++++------------------------- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 2 - > include/linux/tpm.h | 16 ++++--- > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 - > security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 4 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 19 +++++--- > security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c | 4 +- > security/keys/trusted.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 8 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) Should be split at least to three patches and TPM side is already in the upstream. /Jarkko