From: jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 10/12] x86/pconfig: Program memory encryption keys on a system-wide basis
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:31:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911143108.GA9717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180911024657.GC1732@alison-desk.jf.intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:46:57PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:24:20AM -0700, Sakkinen, Jarkko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 15:38 -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> > > The kernel manages the MKTME (Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption) Keys
> > > as a system wide single pool of keys. The hardware, however, manages
> > > the keys on a per physical package basis. Each physical package
> > > maintains a key table that all CPU's in that package share.
> > >
> > > In order to maintain the consistent, system wide view that the kernel
> > > requires, program all physical packages during a key program request.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> >
> > Just kind of checking that are you talking about multiple cores in
> > a single package or really multiple packages?
>
> System wide pool.
> System has multiple packages.
> Packages have multiple CPU's.
>
> The hardware KEY TABLE is per package. I need that per package KEY TABLE
> to be the same in every package across the system. So, I pick one 'lead'
> CPU in each package to program that packages KEY TABLE.
>
> (BTW - I'm going to look into Kai's suggestion to move the system wide view
> of this key programming into the key service. Not sure if that's a go.)
Thanks. I think could be perhaps a fair addition to the documentation?
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 22:23 [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 02/12] mm: Generalize the mprotect implementation to support extensions Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 10:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 0:34 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 03/12] syscall/x86: Wire up a new system call for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 2:56 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:37 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:41 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 05/12] x86/mm: Add a helper function to set keyid bits in encrypted VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 17:57 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 07/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to track " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 3:17 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 08/12] mm: Track VMA's in use for each memory encryption keyid Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 2:39 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 09/12] mm: Restrict memory encryption to anonymous VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:21 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-10 18:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-10 21:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-10 21:09 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 10/12] x86/pconfig: Program memory encryption keys on a system-wide basis Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 1:46 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 18:24 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 2:46 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 14:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 3:29 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 21:47 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-15 0:06 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-17 10:48 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-17 22:34 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:39 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " Alison Schofield
[not found] ` <b9c1e3805c700043d92117462bdb6018bb9f858a.1536356108.git.alison.schofield@intel.com>
2018-09-08 18:44 ` [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API Randy Dunlap
2018-09-10 1:28 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:13 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 0:33 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:45 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 1:14 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:14 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 17:32 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 0:19 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 1:10 ` [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 19:10 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 3:15 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 17:29 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
[not found] ` <7d27511b07c8337e15096214622b66ef8f0fa345.1536356108.git.alison.schofield@intel.com>
2018-09-10 18:02 ` [RFC 06/12] mm: Add the encrypt_mprotect() system call Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 2:15 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 22:03 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys David Howells
2018-09-11 22:39 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 23:01 ` David Howells
2018-09-11 22:56 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " David Howells
2018-09-12 11:12 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911143108.GA9717@intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).