From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall throughs
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:17:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190114201725.13289-2-malat@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190114201725.13289-1-malat@debian.org>
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
these places in the code produced warnings (W=1). Fix them up.
This commit remove the following warning:
security/keys/process_keys.c:380:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/keys/process_keys.c:404:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/keys/process_keys.c:424:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
---
security/keys/process_keys.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 02c77e928f68..3308d738734c 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
if (ret)
break;
+ /* fall through */
case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
ret = key_ref;
break;
@@ -403,6 +404,7 @@ key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
if (ret)
break;
+ /* fall through */
case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
ret = key_ref;
break;
@@ -423,6 +425,7 @@ key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
if (ret)
break;
+ /* fall through */
case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
ret = key_ref;
break;
--
2.19.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-14 20:17 [PATCH 1/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall through Mathieu Malaterre
2019-01-14 20:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre [this message]
2019-01-14 20:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall throughs Mathieu Malaterre
2019-01-23 4:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall through James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190114201725.13289-2-malat@debian.org \
--to=malat@debian.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).