From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4607EC10F09 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116092184A for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b="qAruiHwe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730125AbfB1WUO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:20:14 -0500 Received: from sonic309-27.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.137.65.153]:46834 "EHLO sonic309-27.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730108AbfB1WUL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:20:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1551392410; bh=9aC2ZQuekvXACUyP08KCqpIfMBnwka+hADHn9g2gxyI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=qAruiHweg0chtcklrAUbyyjsB2M02uLIrxX06Cboba6gfPZqCZHbDfrzS7KTjZ3ii1eV10JbJl/gkvK2InTQRtTm2zxd8thADjxHjHEfSo0Ff0I7JZSbjIr1L28RlxsWfuN29HCJDTpGX1mRR2MwRUUHcf59lRJx2kEJD0A17nQ2hynrOg2x8tKe3SWOawZiLZ5GunDf18ivh/68fe9eY2z4Jr5JTbkLbc2jMze1DTE/HYfsPNh43PfGWJKZe6zo0IJI760+R6iRyU0SFW168qWnyBHT5dYKBYow8r9wYoO9uW+t2Pjr1Z1jVGhQox76WrTYwa4rZzIza/zTRAzYig== X-YMail-OSG: wI_1JFAVM1niThMPXwyuq5tvKWU_rHAVa9dCajkdBCwBuQ7Wxw8_OuKpWNEtFHo XRA6WHWu7VbTfKmWXyfubtR3NpRRyI4xHcmbXpUp8HnDKLVM.koRWOj05x0.JvOCIdjxajRw0.lc JhOe1GAv_xnXuBaoilxmYeelww73hFRxF06TltNjIrG2.l6yuNi.oYd3U2poISGqwDk7mbLV6k0a NcHaaRG5MaHzwprvdFYOkHAd5JuPl7HPTdH3AaWwb.EVhel3wZEj8sPnK1euQZ5qMO07IgpX0LTO 2VCh9NDJLXkdUHCs_l6nk5CXrjSbA6JPlsI117gMr3S_PyIejIE7e_eel.J39ltB573Xd.Aqj5zP nHjcTYwUs_KXOyrGX5jigJoGz_ytjKIKdcC.VixGfeuhsUWvf6DMwJy4amyTLsh2lWur.bnCQ.hL mz3l.HsT0RXja2Ep4i76eEmj8NoOyg0Qddj56MjIel0MtTAOGwsrqiM1Qlgxjyqo4NKXpnlkMs_W pPHgtUM1nuBakBm756FdSVQbwzvtrMOrCfXXndw4LYdIT5pNcPUexlb.E.1xTFjKGh5zCDCEKN3g .PBOagI3XKYxRl5AG3PiEtD8nd8uJCginXkHHC31awFysFb8PjVxZLdyaqQjuvTK_fes17UUcz58 SYWY4X43OzpU4daRQvYc9Q33MAOs9k3TYnG_SaOv8BXUaRFQ1Ml0gs3vEv429hSet3ZLMULpbWb0 pWMmnPvDCfH8O5SQ2tZrtf7gT7TGbcl38dxb3xL1Hnqje0oakS4zH3pc7uF0QQcNmGaHlsVUnSXI FvQnzhkb494k79bSNoooyqljSGisqcj6hvNsheqKGkKVRg0CR4LkUZKwL8AOBvRoVF.LDDpnW1R0 Cx73DLmHg.K_LSPE9usEJp6qVb69rwiTR_WYcc.17QCKyEw609iHheEX9118sAWQ_rRWTVr.TCkC DQ0m8O60Znvs5VvF3WVncvkNlQL9bjGojEHjM7WC2BQEy.1nXJEh16XwcEE9BRjCf8Vefgfr56y4 rnuUaQ0DDz96VTL0f6TL8ycF7TUHXIplint2dBjbYjdPsD1IF2.YUOpXUDFO.FOwncU3_BeplbOr 5Pi.LGBuqt3yk8_I9HvBjPR7oKL2KzLTPIEyWpuyX5T0SWfJb Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:20:10 +0000 Received: from c-67-169-65-224.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (EHLO localhost.localdomain) ([67.169.65.224]) by smtp430.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID e588ca5e0935b1286f019b02cb065c6f; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:20:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com Subject: [PATCH 40/97] Smack: Restore the release_secctx hook Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:18:36 -0800 Message-Id: <20190228221933.2551-41-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20190228221933.2551-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20190228221933.2551-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: The secid_to_secctx() hook has to be balanced with a release_secctx hook for stacking. This hook does nothing. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler --- security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c index 37b0ef6ca767..2695bd373752 100644 --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c @@ -4385,10 +4385,11 @@ static int smack_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, } /* - * There used to be a smack_release_secctx hook - * that did nothing back when hooks were in a vector. - * Now that there's a list such a hook adds cost. + * There smack_release_secctx hook does nothing */ +static void smack_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen) +{ +} static int smack_inode_notifysecctx(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen) { @@ -4625,6 +4626,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = { LSM_HOOK_INIT(ismaclabel, smack_ismaclabel), LSM_HOOK_INIT(secid_to_secctx, smack_secid_to_secctx), LSM_HOOK_INIT(secctx_to_secid, smack_secctx_to_secid), + LSM_HOOK_INIT(release_secctx, smack_release_secctx), LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_notifysecctx, smack_inode_notifysecctx), LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_setsecctx, smack_inode_setsecctx), LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_getsecctx, smack_inode_getsecctx), -- 2.17.0