Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: [PATCH 94/97] LSM: Hook for netlabel reconciliation
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:43:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228224356.2608-25-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228224356.2608-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Add an LSM function security_reconcile_netlbl() which
uses the new LSM hook socket_netlbl_secattr() to decide
if the active security modules are in agreement regarding
the labeling of a network packet.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h           | 15 +++++++++
 include/linux/security.h            |  9 ++++++
 security/security.c                 | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/selinux/hooks.c            |  3 ++
 security/selinux/include/netlabel.h |  7 ++++
 security/selinux/netlabel.c         |  9 ++++++
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c          |  9 ++++++
 7 files changed, 102 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index fec7f86897ea..2a53465f94da 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/rculist.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+struct netlbl_lsm_secattr;
+#endif
 /**
  * union security_list_options - Linux Security Module hook function list
  *
@@ -1416,6 +1419,10 @@
  * @bpf_prog_free_security:
  *	Clean up the security information stored inside bpf prog.
  *
+ * Security hooks for network labeling (Netlabel) operations.
+ *
+ * @socket_netlbl_secattr:
+ *	Report the netlabel attributes this module wants for this socket.
  */
 union security_list_options {
 	int (*binder_set_context_mgr)(struct task_struct *mgr);
@@ -1772,6 +1779,11 @@ union security_list_options {
 	int (*bpf_prog_alloc_security)(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux);
 	void (*bpf_prog_free_security)(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux);
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+	void (*socket_netlbl_secattr)(struct sock *sk,
+				      struct netlbl_lsm_secattr **secattr,
+				      int *set);
+#endif
 };
 
 struct security_hook_heads {
@@ -2006,6 +2018,9 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
 	struct hlist_head bpf_prog_alloc_security;
 	struct hlist_head bpf_prog_free_security;
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+	struct hlist_head socket_netlbl_secattr;
+#endif
 } __randomize_layout;
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 7edceb91d77f..c9d7de811b53 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1878,5 +1878,14 @@ static inline void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+extern int security_reconcile_netlbl(struct sock *sk);
+#else
+static inline int security_reconcile_netlbl(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif /* ! __LINUX_SECURITY_H */
 
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index ab1050a2dce3..3c1d2f47b09f 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
 #include <linux/msg.h>
 #include <net/flow.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+#include <net/netlabel.h>
+#endif
 
 #define MAX_LSM_EVM_XATTR	2
 
@@ -2775,3 +2778,50 @@ void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
 	call_void_hook(bpf_prog_free_security, aux);
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+int security_reconcile_netlbl(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *prev = NULL;
+	struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *this = NULL;
+	int prev_set = 0;
+	int this_set = 0;
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.socket_netlbl_secattr,
+				list) {
+		hp->hook.socket_netlbl_secattr(sk, &this, &this_set);
+		if (this_set == 0 || this == NULL)
+			continue;
+		if (prev != NULL) {
+			/*
+			 * Both unlabeled is easily acceptable.
+			 */
+			if (prev_set == NETLBL_NLTYPE_UNLABELED &&
+			    this_set == NETLBL_NLTYPE_UNLABELED)
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * The nltype being different means that
+			 * the secattrs aren't comparible. Except
+			 * that ADDRSELECT means that couldn't know
+			 * when the socket was created.
+			 */
+			if (prev_set != this_set &&
+			    prev_set != NETLBL_NLTYPE_ADDRSELECT &&
+			    this_set != NETLBL_NLTYPE_ADDRSELECT)
+				return -EACCES;
+			/*
+			 * Count on the Netlabel system's judgement.
+			 */
+			if (!netlbl_secattr_equal(prev, this))
+				return -EACCES;
+		}
+		prev = this;
+		prev_set = this_set;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * No conflicts have been found.
+	 */
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_NETLABEL */
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 22a190f291c0..84bfcf7ca08b 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -6769,6 +6769,9 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_free_security, selinux_bpf_map_free),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog_free_security, selinux_bpf_prog_free),
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_netlbl_secattr, selinux_socket_netlbl_secattr),
+#endif
 };
 
 static __init int selinux_init(void)
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
index 8671de09c363..b316c62e7bcc 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ int selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *addr);
 int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked(struct sock *sk,
 					 struct sockaddr *addr);
+void selinux_socket_netlbl_secattr(struct sock *sk,
+				   struct netlbl_lsm_secattr **secattr,
+				   int *set);
 
 #else
 static inline void selinux_netlbl_cache_invalidate(void)
@@ -165,6 +168,10 @@ static inline int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked(struct sock *sk,
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline void selinux_socket_netlbl_secattr(struct sock *sk,
+					struct netlbl_lsm_secattr **secattr)
+{
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_NETLABEL */
 
 #endif
diff --git a/security/selinux/netlabel.c b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
index b6fd905e6e9e..56ae261d2805 100644
--- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
@@ -642,3 +642,12 @@ int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *addr)
 
 	return rc;
 }
+
+void selinux_socket_netlbl_secattr(struct sock *sk,
+				   struct netlbl_lsm_secattr **secattr,
+				   int *set)
+{
+	struct sk_security_struct *sksec = selinux_sock(sk);
+	*secattr = sksec->nlbl_secattr;
+	*set = sksec->nlbl_set;
+}
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 1b9c7e5e801a..885e1799df00 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4487,6 +4487,14 @@ static int smack_dentry_create_files_as(struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+void smack_socket_netlbl_secattr(struct sock *sk,
+				 struct netlbl_lsm_secattr **secattr,
+				 int *set)
+{
+	struct socket_smack *ssp = smack_sock(sk);
+	*secattr = &ssp->smk_out->smk_netlabel;
+	*set = ssp->smk_set;
+}
 
 struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	.lbs_cred = sizeof(struct task_smack),
@@ -4638,6 +4646,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_copy_up, smack_inode_copy_up),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_copy_up_xattr, smack_inode_copy_up_xattr),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(dentry_create_files_as, smack_dentry_create_files_as),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_netlbl_secattr, smack_socket_netlbl_secattr),
 };
 
 
-- 
2.17.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 22:43 [PATCH 00/97] LSM: Complete module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 71/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 72/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list - part 2 Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 73/97] LSM: refactor security_setprocattr Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 74/97] Smack: Detect if secmarks can be safely used Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 75/97] LSM: Support multiple LSMs using inode_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 76/97] LSM: Use full security context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 77/97] LSM: Correct handling of ENOSYS in inode_setxattr Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 78/97] LSM: Infrastructure security blobs for mount options Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 79/97] LSM: Fix for security_init_inode_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 80/97] Smack: Advertise the secid to netlabel Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 81/97] LSM: Change error detection for UDP peer security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 82/97] Smack: Fix setting of the CIPSO MLS_CAT flags Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 83/97] Smack: Set netlabel flags properly on new label import Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 84/97] Netlabel: Add a secattr comparison API function Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 85/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on the ambient domain Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 86/97] Smack: Don't set the socket label on each send Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 87/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on connections Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 88/97] Netlabel: Return the labeling type on socket Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 89/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 90/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 91/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 92/97] LSM: Remember the NLTYPE of netlabel sockets Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 93/97] Smack: Use the NLTYPE on output Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 95/97] LSM: Avoid network conflicts in SELinux and Smack Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 96/97] LSM: Apply Netlabel consitancy checks on send and connect Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 97/97] Smack: Remove the exclusive bit Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190228224356.2608-25-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox