From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Ke Wu <mikewu@google.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: security/loadpin: Allow to exclude specific file types
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 13:33:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201905311330.EA6B6E5F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRnR9Q4AY1nyTebWgkVM-wUfZv7kKNLnsrchWPBH4HPbB-X6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:03:17AM -0700, Ke Wu wrote:
> I think Coverity is correct. Note that it's the size of
> kernel_read_file_str (rather than exclude_read_files) doesn't equal to
> ignore_read_file_id.
>
> This is because READING_MAX_ID is also an element in
> kernel_read_file_str, which makes the size of kernel_read_file_str to
> be READING_MAX_ID+1. I will send a new patch to fix the issue. Thanks
> for the analysis!
Ah! Yes, I see now. I was looking at the wrong things. It should be
possible to just do:
> > >> 209 for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str); j++) {
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id); j++)
and add a
BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str) < ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id))
for future robustness checking.
Thanks for looking at this more closely!
-Kees
> > >> 210 if (strcmp(cur, kernel_read_file_str[j]) == 0) {
> > >> 211 pr_info("excluding: %s\n",
> > >> 212 kernel_read_file_str[j]);
> > >>
> > >> CID 81977 (#1 of 1): Out-of-bounds write
> > >> overrun-local: Overrunning array ignore_read_file_id of 8 4-byte
> > >> elements at element index 8 (byte offset 35) using index j (which
> > >> evaluates to 8).
> > >>
> > >> 213 ignore_read_file_id[j] = 1;
> > >>
> > >> According to Coverity ignore_read_file_id is an array of 8 integers.
> > >> However, ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str) is 9, so we have an out of
> > >> bounds write on ignore_read_file[j] when j is 8.
> > >
> > > What am I missing? This doesn't fail the build:
> > >
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(exclude_read_files) !=
> > > + ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id));
> > >
> > > They have the same number of elements.
> > >
> >
> > Yep, that's very true. I'll discuss this with Coverity as this seems
> > like a weird false positive.
> >
> > Apologies for the noise.
> >
> > Colin
>
>
>
> --
> Ke Wu | Software Engineer | mikewu@google.com | Google Inc.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 10:46 security/loadpin: Allow to exclude specific file types Colin Ian King
2019-05-31 14:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-05-31 14:49 ` Colin Ian King
2019-05-31 18:03 ` Ke Wu
2019-05-31 20:33 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-06-04 17:01 ` Ke Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201905311330.EA6B6E5F@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikewu@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).