From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA24C35E01 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6407521744 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="SKyrGUWa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731104AbgBYPbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:31:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:37159 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731120AbgBYPbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:31:16 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id p14so7356121pfn.4 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:31:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=VzT+Bi9aRcIzHGw33ls7K4ic9gdRd2ue48AE8Ckn9dY=; b=SKyrGUWa4UMK4lem3L5ao7gm5EwFg8zzQVwz4lVhuLmNLxggYbFhFp+9qvKw7Ocr4u eefBfQiK6VRs3kwbcGZxGik+foeRG2TkAWl28VLy8mOVivZWNOp+nmLcypOw2W3t7wS1 Pc9+lfTQiqYNKJKNMfkCGUCUckJAoj+10idh8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=VzT+Bi9aRcIzHGw33ls7K4ic9gdRd2ue48AE8Ckn9dY=; b=GcWkoCu5WGzVgHkz/Wzbaodf7TZDarG5Q2iyp223uhkSfVvprLwWn4wy6/JBLdaghx MscRsJ/xrRR/7lh4WmKBhHnFO3OuKfHjQA3eB3iGk/CKUr4A/jzGlSBTzhn0J7JQLxNS DVBISjL1fezRwHqKkf8HDrG6W/3oJ2r/avK3T1bdEWHJ92Q+dlpYRiKY9HKjCNx3e6Yy lDYNgRoxvTG/3cr7kOrokB3Rz51MN4pS3am1mrKfm0TjsTTT4fvGDd/BAyEmnhfWaj4m p5neWWPVSCs8HVIgWA0EZ5HVIxA7zgKBFQKjcjiSLW6LsP/TxvZ3E4cPRGUw+9dNcLCd JIww== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUHseePNVGweDf/1dyx/qf5oRhuzDYShXjVhhKYTntdJHF2rGh gGofB252G9h4R3aXdCgwSGyGakjeIuE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz96aCOZJnivHeAhI3DTYBvj8Uq0Ew8+dU6teoDezYVy2LVzhSaLWTs/qKzU1bEWOQ1dEE9Dg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8c18:: with SMTP id m24mr60402523pgd.70.1582644675177; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:31:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r62sm17947322pfc.89.2020.02.25.07.31.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:31:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:31:13 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Casey Schaufler , KP Singh , LKML , Linux Security Module list , Alexei Starovoitov , James Morris , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/8] bpf: lsm: provide attachment points for BPF LSM programs Message-ID: <202002250730.62F9BD642A@keescook> References: <20200220175250.10795-1-kpsingh@chromium.org> <20200220175250.10795-4-kpsingh@chromium.org> <0ef26943-9619-3736-4452-fec536a8d169@schaufler-ca.com> <202002211946.A23A987@keescook> <20200223220833.wdhonzvven7payaw@ast-mbp> <20200224171305.GA21886@chromium.org> <00c216e1-bcfd-b7b1-5444-2a2dfa69190b@schaufler-ca.com> <202002241136.C4F9F7DFF@keescook> <20200225054125.dttrc3fvllzu4mx5@ast-mbp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200225054125.dttrc3fvllzu4mx5@ast-mbp> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:41:27PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > I'm proposing to rename BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM into BPF_PROG_TYPE_OVERRIDE_RETURN. Isn't the type used to decide which validator to use? -- Kees Cook