linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709094414.GB3743174@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202007091250.vqzrSanp%lkp@intel.com>

On 09-Jul 12:37, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi KP,
> 
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/KP-Singh/Generalizing-bpf_local_storage/20200709-085810
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> config: mips-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=mips 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c:274:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'inode_storage_map_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      274 | struct bpf_map *inode_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
>          |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c:286:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'inode_storage_map_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      286 | void inode_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>          |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks! Should have been static. Fixed these. Will send a v4 with
these fixes.

- KP 

> 
> vim +/inode_storage_map_alloc +274 kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
> 
>    273	
>  > 274	struct bpf_map *inode_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
>    275	{
>    276		struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
>    277	
>    278		smap = bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(attr);
>    279		if (IS_ERR(smap))
>    280			return ERR_CAST(smap);
>    281	
>    282		smap->cache_idx = cache_idx_get_inode();
>    283		return &smap->map;
>    284	}
>    285	
>  > 286	void inode_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>    287	{
>    288		struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
>    289	
>    290		smap = (struct bpf_local_storage_map *)map;
>    291		cache_idx_free_inode(smap->cache_idx);
>    292		bpf_local_storage_map_free(smap);
>    293	}
>    294	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09  0:56 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Generalizing bpf_local_storage KP Singh
2020-07-09  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Generalize bpf_sk_storage KP Singh
     [not found]   ` <202007091053.Se7i8FMj%lkp@intel.com>
2020-07-09  9:43     ` KP Singh
2020-07-09  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes KP Singh
2020-07-09  4:37   ` kernel test robot
2020-07-09  9:44     ` KP Singh [this message]
2020-07-09  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf: Allow local storage to be used from LSM programs KP Singh
2020-07-09  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf: Add selftests for local_storage KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200709094414.GB3743174@google.com \
    --to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).