From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F5C433E1 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4E120739 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="FAI7jW8F" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728182AbgGQTYv (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:24:51 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:45484 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727999AbgGQTYv (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:24:51 -0400 Received: from sequoia (162-237-133-238.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [162.237.133.238]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAD8220B4909; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com BAD8220B4909 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1595013890; bh=ivjTtf6Ir0rqIr7x6YfCCMUhM1xuE0XyXrXJpxur7rU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FAI7jW8F3YgEhMYTHqpP+4G6Cumfh3qHHczB0F/kTToXYJ8WbOp272vrjIBUMeqQQ dfhbsNzplo0z71UPAkvHoO/GlCvTpMyw7ysT91MzeGukBhYou4t2R90AuHNI9974v0 GM2TG8zi568RF1zxV9VXRzh+m97ZsYkr/CyjZm7s= Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:24:47 -0500 From: Tyler Hicks To: Nayna Cc: Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , Prakhar Srivastava , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Janne Karhunen , Casey Schaufler Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule Message-ID: <20200717192447.GO3673@sequoia> References: <20200709061911.954326-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> <20200709061911.954326-2-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> <5ee27a51-7ff9-5763-c85f-e99e62458657@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5ee27a51-7ff9-5763-c85f-e99e62458657@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On 2020-07-17 15:20:22, Nayna wrote: > > On 7/9/20 2:19 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree(). > > Is it to be called audit rule or filter rule ?  Likewise in subject line. The security hooks call this "audit rule" but Mimi explained the reasoning for IMA referring to this as an "audit filter" here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1593466203.5085.62.camel@linux.ibm.com/ I would be fine with her renaming/rewording this patch, accordingly, in next-integrity-testing. Tyler > > Thanks & Regards, > >     - Nayna