From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sunyuqiong1988@gmail.com,
mkayaalp@cs.binghamton.edu, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
serge@hallyn.com, jmorris@namei.org, christian@brauner.io,
silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, luto@amacapital.net,
jannh@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] ima: Introduce IMA namespace
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818164943.va3um7toztazcfud@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200818152037.11869-1-krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:20:07PM +0200, krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
>
> IMA has not been designed to work with containers. It handles every
> process in the same way, and it cannot distinguish if a process belongs to
> a container or not.
>
> Containers use namespaces to make it appear to the processes in the
> containers that they have their own isolated instance of the global
> resource. For IMA as well, it is desirable to let processes in the
IMA is brought up on a regular basis with "we want to have this" for
years and then non-one seems to really care enough.
I'm highly skeptical of the value of ~2500 lines of code even if it
includes a bunch of namespace boilerplate. It's yet another namespace,
and yet another security framework.
Why does IMA need to be a separate namespace? Keyrings are tied to user
namespaces why can't IMA be? I believe Eric has even pointed that out
before.
Eric, thoughts?
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <N>
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] ima: Introduce IMA namespace krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] ima: Introduce ima namespace krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] ima: Add a list of the installed ima namespaces krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] ima: Bind ima namespace to the file descriptor krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] ima: Add ima policy related data to the ima namespace krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] ima: Add methods for parsing ima policy configuration string krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] ima: Add ima namespace to the ima subsystem APIs krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 07/30] ima: Extend the APIs in the integrity subsystem krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] ima: Add integrity inode related data to the ima namespace krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] ima: Enable per ima namespace policy settings krzysztof.struczynski
2020-08-18 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] ima: Introduce IMA namespace Christian Brauner
2020-08-21 15:18 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-08-18 16:19 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-21 15:13 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-09-02 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 14:06 ` Dr. Greg
2020-09-14 12:05 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-08-18 16:49 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2020-08-21 15:37 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-09-02 19:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-06 17:14 ` Dr. Greg
[not found] ` <CAKrSGQR3Pw=Rad2RgUuCHqr0r2Nc6x2nLoo2cVAkD+_8Vbmd7A@mail.gmail.com>
2020-09-08 14:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-14 12:07 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-10-19 9:30 ` Krzysztof Struczynski
2020-10-25 15:00 ` Dr. Greg
2020-09-09 10:11 ` Dr. Greg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200818164943.va3um7toztazcfud@wittgenstein \
--to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mkayaalp@cs.binghamton.edu \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sunyuqiong1988@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox