linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Linux Security Module list 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	SElinux list <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
	Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: fix fsconfig(2) LSM mount option handling for btrfs
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:54:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401065403.GA1363493@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFqZXNtBrGVrjXAbrn30QSMFP4Gc99fRK23hMujxYu_otzu0yA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:00:39AM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> After taking a closer look, it seems this won't actually work... The
> problem is that since btrfs still uses the legacy mount API, it has no
> way to get to fs_context in btrfs_mount() and thus both of your
> suggestions aren't really workable (again, without converting btrfs at
> least partially to the new API)...

.. and that conversion is long overdue anyway ..

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-16 14:48 [PATCH v2] vfs: fix fsconfig(2) LSM mount option handling for btrfs Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-03-16 18:21 ` Paul Moore
2021-03-16 18:59   ` Al Viro
2021-03-18  9:42     ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-03-29  9:00       ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-01  6:54         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210401065403.GA1363493@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=richard_c_haines@btinternet.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).