From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] landlock: Drop "const" argument qualifier to avoid GCC 4.9 warnings
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 15:36:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910223613.3225685-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
When building under GCC 4.9, the compiler warns about const mismatches:
security/landlock/ruleset.c: In function 'insert_rule':
security/landlock/ruleset.c:196:34: error: passing argument 2 of 'create_rule' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
new_rule = create_rule(object, &this->layers, this->num_layers,
^
security/landlock/ruleset.c:69:30: note: expected 'const struct landlock_layer ** const' but argument is of type 'struct landlock_layer (*)[]'
static struct landlock_rule *create_rule(
^
security/landlock/ruleset.c: In function 'landlock_insert_rule':
security/landlock/ruleset.c:240:38: error: passing argument 3 of 'insert_rule' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
return insert_rule(ruleset, object, &layers, ARRAY_SIZE(layers));
^
security/landlock/ruleset.c:144:12: note: expected 'const struct landlock_layer ** const' but argument is of type 'struct landlock_layer (*)[1]'
static int insert_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
^
Drop "const" from the function definition.
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
security/landlock/ruleset.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index ec72b9262bf3..64c37af88ee7 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void build_check_rule(void)
static struct landlock_rule *create_rule(
struct landlock_object *const object,
- const struct landlock_layer (*const layers)[],
+ struct landlock_layer (*layers)[],
const u32 num_layers,
const struct landlock_layer *const new_layer)
{
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void build_check_ruleset(void)
*/
static int insert_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
struct landlock_object *const object,
- const struct landlock_layer (*const layers)[],
+ struct landlock_layer (*layers)[],
size_t num_layers)
{
struct rb_node **walker_node;
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 22:36 Kees Cook [this message]
2021-09-13 11:19 ` [PATCH] landlock: Drop "const" argument qualifier to avoid GCC 4.9 warnings Mickaël Salaün
2021-09-13 16:16 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910223613.3225685-1-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox