From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v30 26/28] Audit: Add record for multiple object security contexts
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:41:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202111241506.7V9kCQCo-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124014332.36128-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on nf-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master v5.16-rc2]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next next-20211124]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20211124-104307
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git master
config: i386-tinyconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211124/202111241506.7V9kCQCo-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3054c600afec9a016902ed6ed5de86c76d6b0105
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20211124-104307
git checkout 3054c600afec9a016902ed6ed5de86c76d6b0105
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from init/init_task.c:12:
>> include/linux/audit.h:262:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
262 | { }
| ^
include/linux/audit.h:260:20: warning: 'audit_log_object_context' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
260 | static inline void audit_log_object_context(struct audit_buffer *ab,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:262:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
262 | { }
| ^
kernel/exit.c:1817:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1817 | __weak void abort(void)
| ^~~~~
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
include/linux/audit.h:260:20: warning: 'audit_log_object_context' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
260 | static inline void audit_log_object_context(struct audit_buffer *ab,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:262:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
262 | { }
| ^
fs/pipe.c:755:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'account_pipe_buffers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
755 | unsigned long account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:761:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_soft' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
761 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:768:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_hard' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
768 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:775:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_is_unprivileged_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
775 | bool pipe_is_unprivileged_user(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:1245:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_resize_ring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1245 | int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int nr_slots)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
include/linux/audit.h:260:20: warning: 'audit_log_object_context' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
260 | static inline void audit_log_object_context(struct audit_buffer *ab,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +262 include/linux/audit.h
220
221 #else /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
222 static inline __printf(4, 5)
223 void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
224 const char *fmt, ...)
225 { }
226 static inline struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx,
227 gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
228 {
229 return NULL;
230 }
231 static inline __printf(2, 3)
232 void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
233 { }
234 static inline void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
235 { }
236 static inline void audit_log_n_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab,
237 const unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
238 { }
239 static inline void audit_log_n_string(struct audit_buffer *ab,
240 const char *buf, size_t n)
241 { }
242 static inline void audit_log_n_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
243 const char *string, size_t n)
244 { }
245 static inline void audit_log_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
246 const char *string)
247 { }
248 static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
249 const char *prefix,
250 const struct path *path)
251 { }
252 static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
253 { }
254 static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *operation)
255 { }
256 static inline int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
257 {
258 return 0;
259 }
260 static inline void audit_log_object_context(struct audit_buffer *ab,
261 struct lsmblob *blob);
> 262 { }
263 static inline void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
264 { }
265
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211124014332.36128-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 00/28] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 01/28] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:43 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 02/28] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 03/28] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:44 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 04/28] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 05/28] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 06/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 13:19 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-06 2:44 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 07/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 08/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 09/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 10/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 11/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 12/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 13/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 14/28] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 15/28] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 16/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 17/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 18/28] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 19/28] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 20/28] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 21/28] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 22/28] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:44 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 23/28] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:44 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 24/28] Audit: Add framework for auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 25/28] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2021-12-06 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 26/28] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 7:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-11-24 13:40 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-06 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 27/28] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH v30 28/28] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202111241506.7V9kCQCo-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).