From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, serge@hallyn.com,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, containers@lists.linux.dev,
dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
mpeters@redhat.com, lhinds@redhat.com, lsturman@redhat.com,
puiterwi@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, jamjoom@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
rgb@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
jmorris@namei.org, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 26/27] ima: Limit number of policy rules in non-init_ima_ns
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:37:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220201203735.164593-27-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220201203735.164593-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Limit the number of policy rules one can set in non-init_ima_ns to a
hardcoded 1024 rules. If the user attempts to exceed this limit by
setting too many additional rules, emit an audit message with the cause
'too-many-rules' and simply ignore the newly added rules.
Switch the accounting for the memory allocated for IMA policy rules to
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT so that cgroups kernel memory accounting takes effect.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index 58d80884880f..cd102bbd4677 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -410,24 +410,32 @@ static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct ima_namespace *ns = &init_ima_ns;
const char *cause = ns->valid_policy ? "completed" : "failed";
+ int err = 0;
if ((file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY)
return seq_release(inode, file);
- if (ns->valid_policy && ima_check_policy(ns) < 0) {
- cause = "failed";
- ns->valid_policy = 0;
+ if (ns->valid_policy) {
+ err = ima_check_policy(ns);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ if (err == -ENOSPC)
+ cause = "too-many-rules";
+ else
+ cause = "failed";
+ ns->valid_policy = 0;
+ }
}
pr_info("policy update %s\n", cause);
- integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL, NULL,
- "policy_update", cause, !ns->valid_policy, 0);
+ integrity_audit_message(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL, NULL,
+ "policy_update", cause, !ns->valid_policy, 0,
+ -err);
if (!ns->valid_policy) {
ima_delete_rules(ns);
ns->valid_policy = 1;
clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ns->ima_fs_flags);
- return 0;
+ return err;
}
ima_update_policy(ns);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index acb4c36e539f..3f84d04f101d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -305,7 +305,8 @@ static struct ima_rule_opt_list *ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(const substring_t *src)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- opt_list = kzalloc(struct_size(opt_list, items, count), GFP_KERNEL);
+ opt_list = kzalloc(struct_size(opt_list, items, count),
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!opt_list) {
kfree(src_copy);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -379,7 +380,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_namespace *ns,
* Immutable elements are copied over as pointers and data; only
* lsm rules can change
*/
- nentry = kmemdup(entry, sizeof(*nentry), GFP_KERNEL);
+ nentry = kmemdup(entry, sizeof(*nentry), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!nentry)
return NULL;
@@ -826,7 +827,7 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_namespace *ns,
if (policy_rule & IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY) {
entry = kmemdup(&entries[i], sizeof(*entry),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!entry)
continue;
@@ -863,7 +864,7 @@ static int __init ima_init_arch_policy(struct ima_namespace *ns)
ns->arch_policy_entry = kcalloc(arch_entries + 1,
sizeof(*ns->arch_policy_entry),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!ns->arch_policy_entry)
return 0;
@@ -975,8 +976,20 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(struct ima_namespace *ns)
/* Make sure we have a valid policy, at least containing some rules. */
int ima_check_policy(struct ima_namespace *ns)
{
+ struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
+ size_t len1 = 0;
+ size_t len2 = 0;
+
if (list_empty(&ns->ima_temp_rules))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (ns != &init_ima_ns) {
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &ns->ima_temp_rules, list)
+ len1++;
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &ns->ima_policy_rules, list)
+ len2++;
+ if (len1 + len2 > 1024)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -1848,7 +1861,7 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(struct ima_namespace *ns, char *rule)
if (*p == '#' || *p == '\0')
return len;
- entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+ entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!entry) {
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL,
NULL, op, "-ENOMEM", -ENOMEM, audit_info);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-01 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 20:37 [PATCH v10 00/27] ima: Namespace IMA with audit support in IMA-ns Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/27] ima: Remove ima_policy file before directory Stefan Berger
2022-02-10 12:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/27] ima: Do not print policy rule with inactive LSM labels Stefan Berger
2022-02-02 14:17 ` Christian Brauner
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/27] ima: Return error code obtained from securityfs functions Stefan Berger
2022-02-10 12:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-15 18:09 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/27] securityfs: rework dentry creation Stefan Berger
2022-02-10 12:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/27] ima: Define ima_namespace struct and start moving variables into it Stefan Berger
2022-02-16 14:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-16 20:25 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/27] ima: Move arch_policy_entry into ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-02-16 16:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-16 20:48 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-16 20:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-16 21:19 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/27] ima: Move ima_htable " Stefan Berger
2022-02-16 14:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/27] ima: Move measurement list related variables " Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 14:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/27] ima: Move some IMA policy and filesystem " Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 14:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/27] ima: Move IMA securityfs files into ima_namespace or onto stack Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 14:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/27] ima: Move ima_lsm_policy_notifier into ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 20:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-17 20:59 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 21:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 12/27] ima: Define mac_admin_ns_capable() as a wrapper for ns_capable() Stefan Berger
2022-02-05 5:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2022-02-06 17:20 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-07 18:43 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 17:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 13/27] ima: Only accept AUDIT rules for non-init_ima_ns namespaces for now Stefan Berger
2022-02-17 21:32 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 14/27] userns: Add pointer to ima_namespace to user_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-02-18 16:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 15/27] ima: Implement hierarchical processing of file accesses Stefan Berger
2022-02-18 16:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 16/27] ima: Implement ima_free_policy_rules() for freeing of an ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-02-18 17:09 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-18 19:38 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-18 20:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 17/27] ima: Add functions for creating and " Stefan Berger
2022-02-18 19:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 18/27] integrity/ima: Define ns_status for storing namespaced iint data Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 16:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-24 2:21 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-24 2:49 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 19/27] integrity: Add optional callback function to integrity_inode_free() Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 20/27] ima: Namespace audit status flags Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 21/27] ima: Remove unused iints from the integrity_iint_cache Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 22/27] securityfs: Extend securityfs with namespacing support Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 1:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 8:14 ` Christian Brauner
2022-02-23 15:44 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 23/27] ima: Setup securityfs for IMA namespace Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 11:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 24/27] ima: Introduce securityfs file to activate an " Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 13:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 17:08 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 17:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 22:30 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 25/27] ima: Show owning user namespace's uid and gid when displaying policy Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 14:06 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-01 20:37 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2022-02-23 15:38 ` [PATCH v10 26/27] ima: Limit number of policy rules in non-init_ima_ns Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 16:37 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 17:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 20:45 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 20:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-23 21:06 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v10 27/27] ima: Enable IMA namespaces Stefan Berger
2022-02-23 17:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2022-02-23 20:53 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-02 14:13 ` [PATCH v10 00/27] ima: Namespace IMA with audit support in IMA-ns Christian Brauner
2022-02-02 14:40 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-02 16:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-02-02 18:18 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-02 21:27 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220201203735.164593-27-stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jamjoom@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com \
--cc=lhinds@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsturman@redhat.com \
--cc=mpeters@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=puiterwi@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).