From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/30] smack: implement get, set and remove acl hook
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:40:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220930084007.r57rig7qdjx3amcz@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhSRsm85VNW+y0-NTwdatH5-H-KAeeMUgSpx8iD8mOqiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:15:09PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:31 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The current way of setting and getting posix acls through the generic
> > xattr interface is error prone and type unsafe. The vfs needs to
> > interpret and fixup posix acls before storing or reporting it to
> > userspace. Various hacks exist to make this work. The code is hard to
> > understand and difficult to maintain in it's current form. Instead of
> > making this work by hacking posix acls through xattr handlers we are
> > building a dedicated posix acl api around the get and set inode
> > operations. This removes a lot of hackiness and makes the codepaths
> > easier to maintain. A lot of background can be found in [1].
> >
> > So far posix acls were passed as a void blob to the security and
> > integrity modules. Some of them like evm then proceed to interpret the
> > void pointer and convert it into the kernel internal struct posix acl
> > representation to perform their integrity checking magic. This is
> > obviously pretty problematic as that requires knowledge that only the
> > vfs is guaranteed to have and has lead to various bugs. Add a proper
> > security hook for setting posix acls and pass down the posix acls in
> > their appropriate vfs format instead of hacking it through a void
> > pointer stored in the uapi format.
> >
> > I spent considerate time in the security module infrastructure and
> > audited all codepaths. Smack has no restrictions based on the posix
> > acl values passed through it. The capability hook doesn't need to be
> > called either because it only has restrictions on security.* xattrs. So
> > these all becomes very simple hooks for smack.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220801145520.1532837-1-brauner@kernel.org [1]
> > Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > /* v2 */
> > unchanged
> >
> > /* v3 */
> > Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>:
> > - Add get, and remove acl hook
> >
> > /* v4 */
> > Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> >
> > security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>
> Two nit-picky comments below, only worth considering if you are
> respinning for other reasons.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
>
> > diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > index 001831458fa2..8247e8fd43d0 100644
> > --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > @@ -1393,6 +1393,72 @@ static int smack_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * smack_inode_set_acl - Smack check for setting posix acls
> > + * @mnt_userns: the userns attached to the mnt this request came from
> > + * @dentry: the object
> > + * @acl_name: name of the posix acl
> > + * @kacl: the posix acls
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 if access is permitted, an error code otherwise
> > + */
> > +static int smack_inode_set_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> > + struct dentry *dentry, const char *acl_name,
> > + struct posix_acl *kacl)
> > +{
> > + struct smk_audit_info ad;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_DENTRY);
> > + smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path_dentry(&ad, dentry);
> > + rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry)), MAY_WRITE, &ad);
> > + rc = smk_bu_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry), MAY_WRITE, rc);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> Smack tends to add a line of vertical whitespace between the
> smk_ad_setfield_...(...) call and the smk_curacc(...) call in the
> xattr functions, consistency here might be nice.
>
> > +/**
> > + * smack_inode_remove_acl - Smack check for getting posix acls
> > + * @mnt_userns: the userns attached to the mnt this request came from
> > + * @dentry: the object
> > + * @acl_name: name of the posix acl
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 if access is permitted, an error code otherwise
> > + */
> > +static int smack_inode_remove_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> > + struct dentry *dentry, const char *acl_name)
> > +{
> > + struct smk_audit_info ad;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_DENTRY);
> > + smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path_dentry(&ad, dentry);
> > + rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry)), MAY_WRITE, &ad);
> > + rc = smk_bu_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry), MAY_WRITE, rc);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> Same comment about the vertical whitespace applies here.
Ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-30 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 15:30 [PATCH v4 00/30] acl: add vfs posix acl api Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] orangefs: rework posix acl handling when creating new filesystem objects Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 02/30] fs: pass dentry to set acl method Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] fs: rename current get " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] fs: add new " Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 8:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-30 9:09 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 9:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-30 10:05 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 12:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-30 12:49 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-30 13:51 ` Christian Brauner
2022-10-04 19:53 ` Steve French
2022-10-05 7:15 ` Christian Brauner
2022-10-06 6:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-10-06 7:40 ` Christian Brauner
2022-10-06 9:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] cifs: implement " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] cifs: implement set " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] 9p: implement get " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] 9p: implement set " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] security: add get, remove and set acl hook Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 19:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] selinux: implement get, set and remove " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 19:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-30 8:38 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] smack: " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 19:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-30 8:40 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] integrity: implement get and set " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 19:14 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-30 3:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-09-30 14:11 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-30 8:11 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 13/30] evm: add post " Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 1:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-09-30 2:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-09-30 8:44 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-30 11:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-10-04 7:04 ` Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] internal: add may_write_xattr() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] acl: add vfs_set_acl() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] acl: add vfs_get_acl() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] acl: add vfs_remove_acl() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] ksmbd: use vfs_remove_acl() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] ecryptfs: implement get acl method Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] ecryptfs: implement set " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] ovl: implement get " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 22/30] ovl: implement set " Christian Brauner
2022-10-06 12:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] ovl: use posix acl api Christian Brauner
2022-10-06 12:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] xattr: " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] evm: remove evm_xattr_acl_change() Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] ecryptfs: use stub posix acl handlers Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] ovl: " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] cifs: " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] 9p: " Christian Brauner
2022-09-29 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] acl: remove a slew of now unused helpers Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220930084007.r57rig7qdjx3amcz@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox