From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: serge@hallyn.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: commoncap: fix potential memleak on error path from vfs_getxattr_alloc
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:04:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221025130459.kk42edsz56vsd3ur@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221025104544.2298829-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 06:45:44PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> In cap_inode_getsecurity(), we will use vfs_getxattr_alloc() to
> complete the memory allocation of tmpbuf, if we have completed
> the memory allocation of tmpbuf, but failed to call handler->get(...),
> there will be a memleak in below logic:
>
> |-- ret = (int)vfs_getxattr_alloc(mnt_userns, ...) <-- alloc for tmpbuf
> |-- value = krealloc(*xattr_value, error + 1, flags) <-- alloc memory
> |-- error = handler->get(handler, ...) <-- if error
> |-- *xattr_value = value <-- xattr_value is &tmpbuf <-- memory leak
>
> So we will try to free(tmpbuf) after vfs_getxattr_alloc() fails to fix it.
Hey Gaosheng,
>
> Fixes: 71bc356f93a1 ("commoncap: handle idmapped mounts")
The Fixes: tag is wrong afaict. The control flow isn't changed in any
way by the referenced commit.
The logic changed the last time with
82e5d8cc768b ("security: commoncap: fix -Wstringop-overread warning")
but even that commit wouldn't have introduced the bug. It would've been
introduced by 8db6c34f1dbc ("Introduce v3 namespaced file
capabilities"). So update the Fixes: tag with that reference, please.
Otherwise I think you in principle have a point. Not sure if we have any
filesystem that in practice would fail after permission checks have
already passed with the first call to ->get() but then fail with the
correct size passed in the second ->get() invocation. Sounds super
unlikely but not impossible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 10:45 [PATCH] security: commoncap: fix potential memleak on error path from vfs_getxattr_alloc Gaosheng Cui
2022-10-25 13:04 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-10-25 13:45 ` Seth Forshee
2022-10-25 13:51 ` cuigaosheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221025130459.kk42edsz56vsd3ur@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox