linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Alejandro Colomar" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"Konstantin Meskhidze" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
	"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] landlock: Clarify documentation for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER right
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:52:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230221165205.4231-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com> (raw)

Clarify the "refer" documentation by splitting up a big paragraph of text.

- Call out specifically that the denial by default applies to ABI v1 as well.
- Turn the three additional constraints for link/rename operations
  into bullet points, to give it more structure.

Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
index f3223f96469..81d09ef9aa5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
@@ -130,21 +130,37 @@ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
  * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK: Create (or rename or link) a block device.
  * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM: Create (or rename or link) a symbolic link.
  * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER: Link or rename a file from or to a different
- *   directory (i.e. reparent a file hierarchy).  This access right is
- *   available since the second version of the Landlock ABI.  This is also the
- *   only access right which is always considered handled by any ruleset in
- *   such a way that reparenting a file hierarchy is always denied by default.
- *   To avoid privilege escalation, it is not enough to add a rule with this
- *   access right.  When linking or renaming a file, the destination directory
- *   hierarchy must also always have the same or a superset of restrictions of
- *   the source hierarchy.  If it is not the case, or if the domain doesn't
- *   handle this access right, such actions are denied by default with errno
- *   set to ``EXDEV``.  Linking also requires a ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*``
- *   access right on the destination directory, and renaming also requires a
- *   ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` access right on the source's (file or
- *   directory) parent.  Otherwise, such actions are denied with errno set to
- *   ``EACCES``.  The ``EACCES`` errno prevails over ``EXDEV`` to let user space
- *   efficiently deal with an unrecoverable error.
+ *   directory (i.e. reparent a file hierarchy).
+ *
+ *   This access right is available since the second version of the Landlock
+ *   ABI.
+ *
+ *   This is the only access right which is denied by default by any ruleset,
+ *   even if the right is not specified as handled at ruleset creation time.
+ *   The only way to make a ruleset grant this right is to explicitly allow it
+ *   for a specific directory by adding a matching rule to the ruleset.
+ *
+ *   In particular, when using the first Landlock ABI version, Landlock will
+ *   always deny attempts to reparent files between different directories.
+ *
+ *   In addition to the source and destination directories having the
+ *   %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER access right, the attempted link or rename
+ *   operation must meet the following constraints:
+ *
+ *   * The reparented file may not gain more access rights in the destination
+ *     directory than it previously had in the source directory.  If this is
+ *     attempted, the operation results in an ``EXDEV`` error.
+ *
+ *   * When linking or renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*`` right for the
+ *     respective file type must be granted for the destination directory.
+ *     Otherwise, the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
+ *
+ *   * When renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` right for the
+ *     respective file type must be granted for the source directory.  Otherwise,
+ *     the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
+ *
+ *   If multiple requirements are not met, the ``EACCES`` error code takes
+ *   precedence over ``EXDEV``.
  *
  * .. warning::
  *

base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-21 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-21 16:52 Günther Noack [this message]
2023-02-21 17:22 ` [PATCH v4] landlock: Clarify documentation for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER right Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-24 23:00 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-27 11:02   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-27 13:30     ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230221165205.4231-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).