linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
	<brauner@kernel.org>, <lennart@poettering.net>,
	<cyphar@cyphar.com>, <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 04/18] bpf: move unprivileged checks into map_create() and bpf_prog_load()
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:59:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230602150011.1657856-5-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602150011.1657856-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Make each bpf() syscall command a bit more self-contained, making it
easier to further enhance it. We move sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled
handling down to map_create() and bpf_prog_load(), two special commands
in this regard.

Also swap the order of checks, calling bpf_capable() only if
sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled is true, avoiding unnecessary audit
messages.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index edafb0f3053f..4c9e79ec40e2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,15 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	     !node_online(numa_node)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block BPF map
+	 * creation for unprivileged users; other actions depend
+	 * on fd availability and access to bpffs, so are dependent on
+	 * object creation success. Even with unprivileged BPF disabled,
+	 * capability checks are still carried out.
+	 */
+	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_capable())
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	/* find map type and init map: hashtable vs rbtree vs bloom vs ... */
 	map = find_and_alloc_map(attr);
 	if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -2532,6 +2541,16 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 	/* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible to use GPL-ed functions */
 	is_gpl = license_is_gpl_compatible(license);
 
+	/* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block BPF program
+	 * creation for unprivileged users; other actions depend
+	 * on fd availability and access to bpffs, so are dependent on
+	 * object creation success. Even with unprivileged BPF disabled,
+	 * capability checks are still carried out for these
+	 * and other operations.
+	 */
+	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_capable())
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	if (attr->insn_cnt == 0 ||
 	    attr->insn_cnt > (bpf_capable() ? BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS : BPF_MAXINSNS))
 		return -E2BIG;
@@ -5098,23 +5117,8 @@ static int token_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 static int __sys_bpf(int cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
 {
 	union bpf_attr attr;
-	bool capable;
 	int err;
 
-	capable = bpf_capable() || !sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled;
-
-	/* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block key object
-	 * creation commands for unprivileged users; other actions depend
-	 * of fd availability and access to bpffs, so are dependent on
-	 * object creation success.  Capabilities are later verified for
-	 * operations such as load and map create, so even with unprivileged
-	 * BPF disabled, capability checks are still carried out for these
-	 * and other operations.
-	 */
-	if (!capable &&
-	    (cmd == BPF_MAP_CREATE || cmd == BPF_PROG_LOAD))
-		return -EPERM;
-
 	err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02 14:59 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 00/18] BPF token Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 01/18] bpf: introduce BPF token object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 17:41   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-02 20:41   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-03  1:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-05 20:56     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-05 21:48       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-05 23:00         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06 16:58           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-06 17:04             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 02/18] libbpf: add bpf_token_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 03/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF_TOKEN_CREATE test Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 05/18] bpf: inline map creation logic in map_create() function Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 06/18] bpf: centralize permissions checks for all BPF map types Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 07/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 08/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_map_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 09/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled test for BPF_MAP_CREATE command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_BTF_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 11/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_btf_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 12/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled BPF_BTF_LOAD selftest Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 13/18] bpf: keep BPF_PROG_LOAD permission checks clear of validations Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 14/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 15/18] bpf: take into account BPF token when fetching helper protos Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 18:46   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-02 20:07     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 16/18] bpf: consistenly use BPF token throughout BPF verifier logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 17/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_prog_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled BPF_PROG_LOAD tests Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:55 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 00/18] BPF token Casey Schaufler
2023-06-05 20:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-05 22:26     ` Casey Schaufler
2023-06-05 23:12       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06  0:05         ` Casey Schaufler
2023-06-06 16:38           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06 20:13             ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230602150011.1657856-5-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).