From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wang Weiyang <wangweiyang2@huawei.com>,
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
gongruiqi1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capability: erase checker warnings about struct __user_cap_data_struct
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:50:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606175005.GA639588@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhT8k87SdD4_JQFwXShwJeBb3KU7C+R5ABAOhDGvvC0X+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:45:00PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 11:29 PM Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:45:27PM +0800, GONG, Ruiqi wrote:
> > > Currently Sparse warns the following when compiling kernel/capability.c:
> > >
> > > kernel/capability.c:191:35: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> > > kernel/capability.c:191:35: expected void const *from
> > > kernel/capability.c:191:35: got struct __user_cap_data_struct [noderef] __user *
> > > kernel/capability.c:168:14: warning: dereference of noderef expression
> > > ...... (multiple noderef warnings on different locations)
> > > kernel/capability.c:244:29: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> > > kernel/capability.c:244:29: expected void *to
> > > kernel/capability.c:244:29: got struct __user_cap_data_struct [noderef] __user ( * )[2]
> > > kernel/capability.c:247:42: warning: dereference of noderef expression
> > > ...... (multiple noderef warnings on different locations)
> > >
> > > It seems that defining `struct __user_cap_data_struct` together with
> > > `cap_user_data_t` make Sparse believe that the struct is `noderef` as
> > > well. Separate their definitions to clarify their respective attributes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com>
> >
> > Seems ok.
> >
> > There's still so much noise in the make C=2 output even just for
> > kernel/capability.c that I'm not sure it's worth it, but no
> > objection.
> >
> > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> I'm guessing you would prefer if I pulled this via the LSM tree Serge?
Yes, please.
> FWIW, if that is ever the case for future patches, just add a note
> when you ACK something and I'll pick it up.
Thanks, will do.
If it starts happening more than once or twice a month, then I'll get my tree
into shape and start cueing up patches...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 5:45 [PATCH] capability: erase checker warnings about struct __user_cap_data_struct GONG, Ruiqi
2023-06-06 3:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2023-06-06 16:45 ` Paul Moore
2023-06-06 17:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2023-06-06 21:07 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230606175005.GA639588@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
--cc=gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox