* [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail @ 2022-11-28 2:04 limin 2022-11-28 19:44 ` Mickaël Salaün 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: limin @ 2022-11-28 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: shuah, mic, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, trace parent return -1 when child== 0 How to reproduce warning: $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */ err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); if (variant->domain_child) { - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); } else { - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); } if (ret == 0) { -- 2.33.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-28 2:04 [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail limin @ 2022-11-28 19:44 ` Mickaël Salaün 2022-11-29 1:42 ` limin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-28 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: limin, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or something similar? On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: > Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, > trace parent return -1 when child== 0 > How to reproduce warning: > $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests > > Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) > /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */ > err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); > ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); > + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > if (variant->domain_child) { > - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); > } else { > - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); > EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); > } > if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-28 19:44 ` Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-29 1:42 ` limin 2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: limin @ 2022-11-29 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mickaël Salaün, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 I did't use yama. you can reproduce by this step: cd kernel_src cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ make ./ptrace_test On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test > environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or > something similar? > > On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >> How to reproduce warning: >> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >> >> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */ >> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >> if (variant->domain_child) { >> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >> } else { >> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >> } >> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-29 1:42 ` limin @ 2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün 2022-11-29 12:00 ` limin ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-29 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: limin, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: > I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 > > I did't use yama. > > you can reproduce by this step: > > cd kernel_src > > cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ > make > ./ptrace_test > > > > > On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test >> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or >> something similar? >> >> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >>> How to reproduce warning: >>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >>> >>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> >>> --- >>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */ >>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>> if (variant->domain_child) { >>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >>> } else { >>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >>> } >>> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-29 12:00 ` limin 2022-11-30 3:40 ` limin [not found] ` <2bc18685-f975-497f-9c20-da99dbc296c0@huawei.com> 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: limin @ 2022-11-29 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mickaël Salaün, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116 root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your > kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? > > On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: >> I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 >> >> I did't use yama. >> >> you can reproduce by this step: >> >> cd kernel_src >> >> cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ >> make >> ./ptrace_test >> >> >> >> >> On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test >>> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or >>> something similar? >>> >>> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >>>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >>>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >>>> How to reproduce warning: >>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> >>>> --- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >>>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the >>>> parent. */ >>>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >>>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >>>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>> if (variant->domain_child) { >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >>>> } else { >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >>>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >>>> } >>>> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün 2022-11-29 12:00 ` limin @ 2022-11-30 3:40 ` limin [not found] ` <2bc18685-f975-497f-9c20-da99dbc296c0@huawei.com> 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: limin @ 2022-11-30 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mickaël Salaün, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x configuration https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/blob/openEuler-22.09/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your > kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? > > On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: >> I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 >> >> I did't use yama. >> >> you can reproduce by this step: >> >> cd kernel_src >> >> cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ >> make >> ./ptrace_test >> >> >> >> >> On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test >>> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or >>> something similar? >>> >>> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >>>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >>>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >>>> How to reproduce warning: >>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> >>>> --- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >>>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the >>>> parent. */ >>>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >>>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >>>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>> if (variant->domain_child) { >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >>>> } else { >>>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >>>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >>>> } >>>> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2bc18685-f975-497f-9c20-da99dbc296c0@huawei.com>]
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail [not found] ` <2bc18685-f975-497f-9c20-da99dbc296c0@huawei.com> @ 2022-11-30 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün 2022-11-30 19:47 ` Jeff Xu 2023-07-31 14:37 ` Mickaël Salaün 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-30 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: limin, Jeff Xu Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, Jorge Lucangeli Obes, Guenter Roeck, Kees Cook I checked and the Landlock ptrace test failed because Yama is enabled, which is expected. You can check that with /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope Jeff Xu sent a patch to fix this case but it is not ready yet: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628222941.2642917-1-jeffxu@google.com Could you please send a new patch Jeff, and add Limin in Cc? On 29/11/2022 12:26, limin wrote: > cat /proc/cmdline > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116 > root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all > > > config > > # > # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. > # Linux/x86 6.1.0-rc6 Kernel Configuration > # [...] > CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA=y [...] > CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor" [...] > > On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your >> kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? >> >> On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: >>> I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 >>> >>> I did't use yama. >>> >>> you can reproduce by this step: >>> >>> cd kernel_src >>> >>> cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ >>> make >>> ./ptrace_test >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>>> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test >>>> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or >>>> something similar? >>>> >>>> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >>>>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >>>>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >>>>> How to reproduce warning: >>>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >>>>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the >>>>> parent. */ >>>>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >>>>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>>> if (variant->domain_child) { >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >>>>> } else { >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >>>>> } >>>>> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-30 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün @ 2022-11-30 19:47 ` Jeff Xu 2023-07-31 14:37 ` Mickaël Salaün 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeff Xu @ 2022-11-30 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mickaël Salaün Cc: limin, hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, Jorge Lucangeli Obes, Guenter Roeck, Kees Cook On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:32 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: > > I checked and the Landlock ptrace test failed because Yama is enabled, > which is expected. You can check that with > /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope > > Jeff Xu sent a patch to fix this case but it is not ready yet: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628222941.2642917-1-jeffxu@google.com > > Could you please send a new patch Jeff, and add Limin in Cc? > Yes. This work is planned for Dec. I will start working on it soon. Jeff > > On 29/11/2022 12:26, limin wrote: > > cat /proc/cmdline > > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116 > > root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro > > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all > > > > > > config > > > > # > > # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. > > # Linux/x86 6.1.0-rc6 Kernel Configuration > > # > > [...] > > > CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA=y > > [...] > > > CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor" > [...] > > > > On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > >> I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your > >> kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? > >> > >> On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: > >>> I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 > >>> > >>> I did't use yama. > >>> > >>> you can reproduce by this step: > >>> > >>> cd kernel_src > >>> > >>> cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ > >>> make > >>> ./ptrace_test > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > >>>> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test > >>>> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or > >>>> something similar? > >>>> > >>>> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: > >>>>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, > >>>>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 > >>>>> How to reproduce warning: > >>>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- > >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > >>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > >>>>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 > >>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > >>>>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) > >>>>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the > >>>>> parent. */ > >>>>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); > >>>>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); > >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > >>>>> if (variant->domain_child) { > >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); > >>>>> } else { > >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); > >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); > >>>>> } > >>>>> if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail 2022-11-30 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün 2022-11-30 19:47 ` Jeff Xu @ 2023-07-31 14:37 ` Mickaël Salaün 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Mickaël Salaün @ 2023-07-31 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: limin, Jeff Xu Cc: hannes, mhocko, roman.gushchin, shakeelb, songmuchun, tj, lizefan.x, shuah, linux-kselftest, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, Jorge Lucangeli Obes, Guenter Roeck, Kees Cook Hi limin, Just to let you know that Jeff's patch was merged and is available since Linux 6.3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230114020306.1407195-1-jeffxu@google.com/ Regards, Mickaël On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > I checked and the Landlock ptrace test failed because Yama is enabled, which > is expected. You can check that with /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope > > Jeff Xu sent a patch to fix this case but it is not ready yet: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628222941.2642917-1-jeffxu@google.com > > Could you please send a new patch Jeff, and add Limin in Cc? > > > On 29/11/2022 12:26, limin wrote: > > cat /proc/cmdline > > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116 > > root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro > > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all > > > > > > config > > > > # > > # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. > > # Linux/x86 6.1.0-rc6 Kernel Configuration > > # > > [...] > > > CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA=y > > [...] > > > CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor" > [...] > > > > On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > > I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your > > > kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? > > > > > > On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: > > > > I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 > > > > > > > > I did't use yama. > > > > > > > > you can reproduce by this step: > > > > > > > > cd kernel_src > > > > > > > > cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ > > > > make > > > > ./ptrace_test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > > > > This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test > > > > > environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or > > > > > something similar? > > > > > > > > > > On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: > > > > > > Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, > > > > > > trace parent return -1 when child== 0 > > > > > > How to reproduce warning: > > > > > > $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > > > > > > b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > > > > > > index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 > > > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > > > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c > > > > > > @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) > > > > > > /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the > > > > > > parent. */ > > > > > > err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); > > > > > > ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); > > > > > > + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > > > > > > + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > > > > > > if (variant->domain_child) { > > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); > > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); > > > > > > EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); > > > > > > EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); > > > > > > } > > > > > > if (ret == 0) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-31 14:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-28 2:04 [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail limin
2022-11-28 19:44 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-29 1:42 ` limin
2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-29 12:00 ` limin
2022-11-30 3:40 ` limin
[not found] ` <2bc18685-f975-497f-9c20-da99dbc296c0@huawei.com>
2022-11-30 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-30 19:47 ` Jeff Xu
2023-07-31 14:37 ` Mickaël Salaün
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).