From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672AEC001DF for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 12:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231537AbjHAMze (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:55:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230026AbjHAMzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:55:33 -0400 Received: from mail.hallyn.com (mail.hallyn.com [178.63.66.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57BFDE6 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 05:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.hallyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8E83B7EF; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 07:55:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 07:55:29 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: "Dr. Greg" Cc: Paul Moore , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TSEM feedback. Message-ID: <20230801125529.GA915814@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20230731103822.GA4093@wind.enjellic.com> <20230801105421.GA23193@wind.enjellic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230801105421.GA23193@wind.enjellic.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:54:21AM -0500, Dr. Greg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:57:08AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > Good morning, I hope the day is starting well. > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 6:39???AM Dr. Greg wrote: > > > > > > Good morning Paul, I hope this note finds your week starting well. > > > > > > We submitted the patches for the V2 release of TSEM three weeks ago. > > > > > > We received some feedback from Randy Dunlap on some documentations > > > issues that we went on to address. > > > > > > Haven't heard any reflections from you. Was just wondering if you > > > were swamped or had possibly missed the submission? We didn't include > > > you as a copy on the notion that you didn't need two sets of patches > > > landing in your inbox. > > > If your mail hits the mail archive on lore.kernel.org, it is almost > > a full guarantee that it has hit my inbox and/or the patchwork > > instance I use to ensure nothing is missed. > > So noted. > > > As one would expect, it takes a good deal of time to review a patch > > submission as large as TSEM, and the rather ornate language used in > > the documentation only slows the process. > > For whatever it is worth, as a group, we invested a considerable > amount of time, over a period of now 8+ years, in refining the > terminology and nomenclature embodied in that document. > > I guess the only defense at hand is a variant on the alleged response > by Austrian Emperor Joseph II to Mozart's "Die Entfuhrung aus dem > Serail": > > "It contains as many words, with appropriate ornateness, as was deemed > necessary." I cannot let such a golden opportunity pass to use https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA-sEfXOaEQ