From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Konstantin Meskhidze" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] selftests/landlock: Add tests to check undefined rule's access rights
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 20:39:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231120193914.441117-2-mic@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120193914.441117-1-mic@digikod.net>
Extend two tests to make sure that we cannot add a rule with access
rights that are undefined:
* fs: layout1.file_and_dir_access_rights
* net: mini.network_access_rights
The checks test all 64 bits access right values until it overflows.
Replace one ASSERT with EXPECT in layout1.file_and_dir_access_rights .
Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index 18e1f86a6234..d77155d75de5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -548,7 +548,6 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1, inval)
TEST_F_FORK(layout1, file_and_dir_access_rights)
{
__u64 access;
- int err;
struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath_file = {},
path_beneath_dir = {};
struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
@@ -568,11 +567,19 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1, file_and_dir_access_rights)
open(dir_s1d2, O_PATH | O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC);
ASSERT_LE(0, path_beneath_dir.parent_fd);
- for (access = 1; access <= ACCESS_LAST; access <<= 1) {
+ for (access = 1; access > 0; access <<= 1) {
+ int err;
+
path_beneath_dir.allowed_access = access;
- ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd,
- LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH,
- &path_beneath_dir, 0));
+ err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH,
+ &path_beneath_dir, 0);
+ if (access <= ACCESS_LAST) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, err);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, err);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+ continue;
+ }
path_beneath_file.allowed_access = access;
err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
index 929e21c4db05..9356f5800e31 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
@@ -1246,14 +1246,17 @@ TEST_F(mini, network_access_rights)
landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
- for (access = 1; access <= ACCESS_LAST; access <<= 1) {
+ for (access = 1; access > 0; access <<= 1) {
+ int err;
+
net_port.allowed_access = access;
- EXPECT_EQ(0,
- landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT,
- &net_port, 0))
- {
- TH_LOG("Failed to add rule with access 0x%llx: %s",
- access, strerror(errno));
+ err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT,
+ &net_port, 0);
+ if (access <= ACCESS_LAST) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, err);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, err);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
}
}
EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
--
2.42.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 19:39 [PATCH v1 0/2] Extend Landlock test to improve rule's coverage Mickaël Salaün
2023-11-20 19:39 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2023-11-24 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] selftests/landlock: Add tests to check undefined rule's access rights Günther Noack
2023-11-30 9:17 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-11-20 19:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] selftests/landlock: Add tests to check unhandled " Mickaël Salaün
2023-11-24 17:12 ` Günther Noack
2023-11-30 9:17 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-11-27 8:04 ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-11-30 9:18 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231120193914.441117-2-mic@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).