linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<paul@paul-moore.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
	<torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 10/29] bpf,lsm: refactor bpf_map_alloc/bpf_map_free LSM hooks
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 14:20:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103222034.2582628-11-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103222034.2582628-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc
hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also
bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs.

Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it
currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which
seems to be a sweet spot.

But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free
LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few
LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully
allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF
map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we
need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the
outcome.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h |  5 +++--
 include/linux/security.h      |  6 ++++--
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c          |  6 +++---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c          |  4 ++--
 security/security.c           | 16 ++++++++++------
 security/selinux/hooks.c      |  7 ++++---
 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
index 41ec4a7c070e..adb25cc63ce3 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
@@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, audit_rule_free, void *lsmrule)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_alloc_security, struct bpf_map *map)
-LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free_security, struct bpf_map *map)
+LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_create, struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr,
+	 struct bpf_token *token)
+LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free, struct bpf_map *map)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog_load, struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
 	 struct bpf_token *token)
 LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_prog_free, struct bpf_prog *prog)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 65467eef6678..08fd777cbe94 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -2025,7 +2025,8 @@ struct bpf_token;
 extern int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size);
 extern int security_bpf_map(struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode);
 extern int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
-extern int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map);
+extern int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				   struct bpf_token *token);
 extern void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map);
 extern int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
 				  struct bpf_token *token);
@@ -2047,7 +2048,8 @@ static inline int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map)
+static inline int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr,
+					  struct bpf_token *token)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 7ee0dd011de4..76976908b302 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 BTF_SET_START(sleepable_lsm_hooks)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map)
-BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_alloc_security)
-BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_create)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_load)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free)
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_userns_create)
 BTF_SET_END(sleepable_lsm_hooks)
 
 BTF_SET_START(untrusted_lsm_hooks)
-BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_alloc_security)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_free_security)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 19a0d5dd4d7e..d6337842006d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1318,9 +1318,9 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 			attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
 	}
 
-	err = security_bpf_map_alloc(map);
+	err = security_bpf_map_create(map, attr, token);
 	if (err)
-		goto free_map;
+		goto free_map_sec;
 
 	err = bpf_map_alloc_id(map);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index c8a1c66cfaad..ad24cf36da94 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -5167,16 +5167,20 @@ int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 }
 
 /**
- * security_bpf_map_alloc() - Allocate a bpf map LSM blob
- * @map: bpf map
+ * security_bpf_map_create() - Check if BPF map creation is allowed
+ * @map: BPF map object
+ * @attr: BPF syscall attributes used to create BPF map
+ * @token: BPF token used to grant user access
  *
- * Initialize the security field inside bpf map.
+ * Do a check when the kernel creates a new BPF map. This is also the
+ * point where LSM blob is allocated for LSMs that need them.
  *
  * Return: Returns 0 on success, error on failure.
  */
-int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map)
+int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr,
+			    struct bpf_token *token)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(bpf_map_alloc_security, 0, map);
+	return call_int_hook(bpf_map_create, 0, map, attr, token);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -5205,7 +5209,7 @@ int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
  */
 void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
-	call_void_hook(bpf_map_free_security, map);
+	call_void_hook(bpf_map_free, map);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index c2de56ca5ea5..c4ba3f0fcb97 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -6777,7 +6777,8 @@ static int selinux_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 			    BPF__PROG_RUN, NULL);
 }
 
-static int selinux_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map)
+static int selinux_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				  struct bpf_token *token)
 {
 	struct bpf_security_struct *bpfsec;
 
@@ -7174,7 +7175,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf, selinux_bpf),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map, selinux_bpf_map),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog, selinux_bpf_prog),
-	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_free_security, selinux_bpf_map_free),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_free, selinux_bpf_map_free),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog_free, selinux_bpf_prog_free),
 #endif
 
@@ -7232,7 +7233,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(audit_rule_init, selinux_audit_rule_init),
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
-	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_alloc_security, selinux_bpf_map_alloc),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_create, selinux_bpf_map_create),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog_load, selinux_bpf_prog_load),
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-03 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-03 22:20 [PATCH bpf-next 00/29] BPF token Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/29] bpf: align CAP_NET_ADMIN checks with bpf_capable() approach Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/29] bpf: add BPF token delegation mount options to BPF FS Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/29] bpf: introduce BPF token object Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05 20:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 20:32     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-05 20:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 22:06         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05 22:05     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05 22:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05 21:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 22:18     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-08 12:02       ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-08 23:58         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-09 14:52           ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-09 19:00             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-10 14:59               ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-11  0:42                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-11 10:38                   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-11 17:41                     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-12  7:58                       ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-12 18:32                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-12 19:16                           ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-14  2:29                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-16 16:37                               ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-08 12:01     ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-08 16:45     ` Paul Moore
2024-01-09  0:07       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-10 19:29         ` Paul Moore
2024-01-08 11:44   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/29] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE command Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/29] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_BTF_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/29] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/29] bpf: take into account BPF token when fetching helper protos Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/29] bpf: consistently use BPF token throughout BPF verifier logic Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/29] bpf,lsm: refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free LSM hooks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/29] bpf,lsm: add BPF token " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/29] libbpf: add bpf_token_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/29] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_map_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 19:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-04 19:23     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/29] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_btf_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/29] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_prog_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/29] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled tests Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/29] bpf,selinux: allocate bpf_security_struct per BPF token Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/29] bpf: fail BPF_TOKEN_CREATE if no delegation option was set on BPF FS Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/29] bpf: support symbolic BPF FS delegation mount options Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/29] selftests/bpf: utilize string values for delegate_xxx " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/29] libbpf: split feature detectors definitions from cached results Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/29] libbpf: further decouple feature checking logic from bpf_object Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/29] libbpf: move feature detection code into its own file Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/29] libbpf: wire up token_fd into feature probing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/29] libbpf: wire up BPF token support at BPF object level Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/29] selftests/bpf: add BPF object loading tests with explicit token passing Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/29] selftests/bpf: add tests for BPF object load with implicit token Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/29] libbpf: support BPF token path setting through LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/29] selftests/bpf: add tests for " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-03 23:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/29] BPF token Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240103222034.2582628-11-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).