linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] tomoyo: replace current->in_execve flag with security_execve_abort() hook
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 06:25:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402070625.57945D6995@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a901d27-dba5-4ff4-9e47-373c54965253@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 07:53:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> TOMOYO was using current->in_execve flag in order to restore previous state
> when previous execve() request failed. Since security_execve_abort() hook
> was added, switch to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

With the kern-doc fixed, this looks good. (I can fix up the kern-doc if
this goes via my tree.)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-07 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-03 10:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] fs/exec: remove current->in_execve flag Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-03 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] LSM: add security_execve_abort() hook Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-07 14:24   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-07 14:41     ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-07 15:21     ` Paul Moore
2024-02-07 15:43       ` Kees Cook
2024-02-07 16:45         ` Paul Moore
2024-02-07 17:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-07 18:12             ` Paul Moore
2024-02-07 22:22             ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-08  0:57               ` Paul Moore
2024-02-03 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tomoyo: replace current->in_execve flag with " Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-04  1:53   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-07 14:25   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-03 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fs/exec: remove current->in_execve flag Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-07 14:26   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-05  3:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Serge Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402070625.57945D6995@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).