From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C772464A; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708732980; cv=none; b=kDjM32wcEVGQYrqAaq+rVbsPABqUznuaeW06aDEjf2rdiLt2eYmayeTaFOtOZW1ecBPxj3jZA216nVpkyHh6kY6vZGweDJUrSmiWVGS7m9uEb4sY3kgjhZqno0CFHc7Ypd/FYR/xiQEo1kQMFd9khX6SEVm2DZJPXI1GjjiKmBw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708732980; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E1uy0ZF05Atmh5fp16Nfgz89BZCFPu4kh33ZjkboSKE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UyxlFrCcyp+qgX5vefNfihbNkd+g1LB7GcAHHuL4gDfQD645ARAW8VwGeQ1ktH6QRDBUr/WWu1YhV1H2mmTBPVTXIyPe1g+0wJsGZVJLyD75UJEJHWZFA2DMrqfgoVhapAY2X7qfAn6tcucpKTCZhkdbInW6pNDjxvKlTUnCzV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=s+P3uORr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="s+P3uORr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42869C433C7; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:03:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708732980; bh=E1uy0ZF05Atmh5fp16Nfgz89BZCFPu4kh33ZjkboSKE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s+P3uORrRjLKyypCblsp3pTaVGTXwPDPYAlzHcXvJrMYeHhRkSmcPr7mbij/EqxUB T6gMs5c9GdnCkgRXsqf43n+6dez0qMV5JRqq9TZHTIJBlbYqSW9dTlePvpNzB9psCj 3XvkZN+LxtByOqMb1hORzh0yJ3Ae9ihSwhWdaU7TH5Qg8a3VQnYyFeujswipWkMXFY L4U7Ihlt7/n83EoG3KDxRsKBGJYbFPP3bR1S+MW4h+/m+vNrw/8vfxNMWVFgiTsyc+ Lai3ADRfmUAd4DMkJLiwZ4JvTbcXm+FwcAACxj1l40IEhtZbJJIcxpEVpHDJhTUo7a mswj3I/Mhrphw== Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:02:59 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: mic@digikod.net Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, jakub@cloudflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Message-ID: <20240223160259.22c61d1e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240220192235.2953484-1-kuba@kernel.org> References: <20240220192235.2953484-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:22:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return > codes to pass/fail/skip. >=20 > Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes > under kselftest_harness. >=20 > Merge plan is to put it on top of -rc4 and merge into net-next. > That way others should be able to pull the patches without > any networking changes. Hi Micka=C3=ABl, would you be able to take a look at those changes? landlock seems to be the sole user of the "no_print" functionality in the selftest harness. If the patches look good I'll create a branch based on Linus's tree so that anyone interested can pull the changes in..